[PATCH v1 14/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_cache_invalidate_user

Nicolin Chen nicolinc at nvidia.com
Wed Mar 22 13:57:23 PDT 2023


On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 07:19:34PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:

> > IIUIC, the ioctl for the link of vSID/dev_id should happen at
> > the stage when boot boots, while the HWPT alloc ioctl happens
> > at CFGI_STE.
> 
> Yes
>  
> > > > What could be a good prototype of the ioctl? Would it be a VFIO
> > > > device one or IOMMUFD one?
> > > 
> > > If we load the vSID table it should be a iommufd one, linked to the
> > > ARM SMMUv3 driver and probably take in a pointer to an array of
> > > vSID/dev_id pairs. Maybe an add/remove type of operation.
> > 
> > Will try some solution.
> 
> It is only necessary if you want to do batching
> 
> For non-batching the SID invalidation should be done differently with
> a device_id input instead. That is a bit tricky to organize as you
> want iommufd to get back a 'struct device *' from the ID.

I am wondering whether we need to have dev_id, i.e. IOMMUFD,
in play with the link of pSID<->vSID, as I am thinking of a
simplified approach by passing the vSID via the hwpt alloc
structure when we allocate an S2 domain.

The arm_smmu_domain_alloc_user() takes this vSID and a dev
pointer, so it can easily tie the vSID to the dev's pSID.

By doing so, we wouldn't need a new ioctl anymore.

Thanks
Nic



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list