[PATCH V3 1/2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-wakeup: Introduce RTC node

[Dhruva Gole]

Hi,

On 20/03/23 22:21, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Introduce digital RTC node in wakeup domain. Even though this has
> no specific battery backup supply, this on-chip RTC is used in
> cost-optimized board designs as a wakeup source.
>
> Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole at ti.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bryan Brattlof <bb at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm at ti.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Just reviewed-by pickups
>
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230315170706.1598977-2-nm@ti.com/
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230311105850.21811-2-nm@ti.com/
>
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi
> index 38dced6b4fef..fec81546fbbd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-wakeup.dtsi
> @@ -40,4 +40,14 @@ wkup_i2c0: i2c at 2b200000 {
>  		clock-names = "fck";
>  		status = "disabled";
>  	};
> +
> +	wkup_rtc0: rtc at 2b1f0000 {
> +		compatible = "ti,am62-rtc";
> +		reg = <0x00 0x2b1f0000 0x00 0x100>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 100 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		clocks = <&k3_clks 117 6> , <&k3_clks 117 0>;
> +		clock-names = "vbus", "osc32k";
> +		power-domains = <&k3_pds 117 TI_SCI_PD_EXCLUSIVE>;
> +		wakeup-source;
> +	};
>  };

I was just wondering why some of the rtctests show failures on this platform:

https://gist.github.com/DhruvaG2000/5c6d8bb99b087308b916985d70f0c440

pass:5 fail:2

the test is compiled from tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c for arm64 target

Is this expected?

-- 
Best regards,
Dhruva Gole
Texas Instruments Incorporated