[PATCH v2 8/9] PCI: rockchip: Use u32 variable to access 32-bit registers
Rick Wertenbroek
rick.wertenbroek at gmail.com
Tue Mar 14 08:45:56 PDT 2023
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:34 AM Damien Le Moal
<damien.lemoal at opensource.wdc.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/14/23 23:08, Rick Wertenbroek wrote:
> > Previously u16 variables were used to access 32-bit registers, this
> > resulted in not all of the data being read from the registers. Also
> > the left shift of more than 16-bits would result in moving data out
> > of the variable. Use u32 variables to access 32-bit registers
> >
> > Fixes: cf590b078391 ("PCI: rockchip: Add EP driver for Rockchip PCIe controller")
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Rick Wertenbroek <rick.wertenbroek at gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 10 +++++-----
> > drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> > index ca5b363ba..b7865a94e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> > @@ -292,15 +292,15 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_set_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, u8 vfn,
> > {
> > struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> > struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
> > - u16 flags;
> > + u32 flags;
> >
> > flags = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip,
> > ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) +
> > ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_REG);
> > flags &= ~ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_MASK;
> > flags |=
> > - ((multi_msg_cap << 1) << ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET) |
> > - PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT;
> > + (multi_msg_cap << ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET) |
>
> ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET is 17 and multi_msg_cap is a u8...
> Not nice.
>
> Locally, I added the local variable:
>
> u32 mmc = multi_msg_cap;
>
> And use mmc instead of multi_msg_cap to avoid issues. Also,
>
> > + (PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT << ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_FLAGS_OFFSET);
> > flags &= ~ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MASK_MSI_CAP;
> > rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, flags,
> > ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) +
> > @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_get_msi(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn, u8 vfn)
> > {
> > struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
> > struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
> > - u16 flags;
> > + u32 flags;
> >
> > flags = rockchip_pcie_read(rockchip,
> > ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_FUNC_BASE(fn) +
> > @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_send_msi_irq(struct rockchip_pcie_ep *ep, u8 fn,
> > u8 interrupt_num)
> > {
> > struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = &ep->rockchip;
> > - u16 flags, mme, data, data_mask;
> > + u32 flags, mme, data, data_mask;
> > u8 msi_count;
> > u64 pci_addr, pci_addr_mask = 0xff;
> > u32 r;
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> > index e90c2a2b8..11dbf53cd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h
> > @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@
> > #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_CMD_STATUS 0x4
> > #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_CMD_STATUS_IS BIT(19)
> > #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_REG 0x90
> > +#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_FLAGS_OFFSET 16
>
> You are not using this macro anywhere. The name is also not very
> descriptive. Better have it as:
>
> #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_ME BIT(16)
>
> to match the TRM name and be clear that the bit indicates if MSI is
> enabled or not.
>
This is already the case, the #define is already there.
#define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_ME BIT(16)
The other offset is for all the MSI flags together, this offset is used
when the flags are retrieved altogether, see rockchip_pcie_ep_set_msi()
The ME bit is also used when we need to check the bit specifically, see
rockchip_pcie_ep_get_msi().
> > #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_OFFSET 17
> > #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MMC_MASK GENMASK(19, 17)
> > #define ROCKCHIP_PCIE_EP_MSI_CTRL_MME_OFFSET 20
>
> --
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list