[PATCH RFC v6 2/6] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions
Vadim Fedorenko
vadim.fedorenko at linux.dev
Mon Mar 13 15:59:32 PDT 2023
On 13.03.2023 16:21, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 03:28:03AM CET, vadfed at meta.com wrote:
>> DPLL framework is used to represent and configure DPLL devices
>> in systems. Each device that has DPLL and can configure sources
>> and outputs can use this framework. Netlink interface is used to
>> provide configuration data and to receive notification messages
>> about changes in the configuration or status of DPLL device.
>> Inputs and outputs of the DPLL device are represented as special
>> objects which could be dynamically added to and removed from DPLL
>> device.
>>
>> Changes:
>> dpll: adapt changes after introduction of dpll yaml spec
>> dpll: redesign after review comments, fix minor issues
>> dpll: add get pin command
>> dpll: _get/_put approach for creating and realesing pin or dpll objects
>> dpll: lock access to dplls with global lock
>> dpll: lock access to pins with global lock
>>
>> dpll: replace cookie with clock id
>> dpll: add clock class
>
> Looks like some leftover in patch description.
Yeah, it's a changelog from the previous iteration.
>>
>> Provide userspace with clock class value of DPLL with dpll device dump
>> netlink request. Clock class is assigned by driver allocating a dpll
>> device. Clock class values are defined as specified in:
>> ITU-T G.8273.2/Y.1368.2 recommendation.
>>
>> dpll: follow one naming schema in dpll subsys
>>
>> dpll: fix dpll device naming scheme
>>
>> Fix dpll device naming scheme by use of new pattern.
>> "dpll_%s_%d_%d", where:
>> - %s - dev_name(parent) of parent device,
>> - %d (1) - enum value of dpll type,
>> - %d (2) - device index provided by parent device.
>>
>> dpll: remove description length parameter
>>
>> dpll: fix muxed/shared pin registration
>>
>> Let the kernel module to register a shared or muxed pin without finding
>> it or its parent. Instead use a parent/shared pin description to find
>> correct pin internally in dpll_core, simplifing a dpll API.
>>
>> dpll: move function comments to dpll_core.c, fix exports
>> dpll: remove single-use helper functions
>> dpll: merge device register with alloc
>> dpll: lock and unlock mutex on dpll device release
>> dpll: move dpll_type to uapi header
>> dpll: rename DPLLA_DUMP_FILTER to DPLLA_FILTER
>> dpll: rename dpll_pin_state to dpll_pin_mode
>> dpll: rename DPLL_MODE_FORCED to DPLL_MODE_MANUAL
>> dpll: remove DPLL_CHANGE_PIN_TYPE enum value
>
> I'm confused, some messed-up squash?
Yep, from previous iteration. I'll remove it next time.
>> Co-developed-by: Milena Olech <milena.olech at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Milena Olech <milena.olech at intel.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Michal Michalik <michal.michalik at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Michalik <michal.michalik at intel.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko at linux.dev>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 9 +
>> drivers/Kconfig | 2 +
>> drivers/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/dpll/Kconfig | 7 +
>> drivers/dpll/Makefile | 10 +
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c | 835 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h | 99 ++++
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c | 1065 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h | 30 +
>> include/linux/dpll.h | 284 ++++++++++
>> 10 files changed, 2342 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Kconfig
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/dpll.h
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index edd3d562beee..0222b19af545 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -6289,6 +6289,15 @@ F: Documentation/networking/device_drivers/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/switch-drive
>> F: drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-switch*
>> F: drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpsw*
>>
>> +DPLL CLOCK SUBSYSTEM
>> +M: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko at linux.dev>
>> +M: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski at intel.com>
>> +L: netdev at vger.kernel.org
>> +S: Maintained
>> +F: drivers/dpll/*
>> +F: include/net/dpll.h
>> +F: include/uapi/linux/dpll.h
>> +
>> DRBD DRIVER
>> M: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner at linbit.com>
>> M: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg at linbit.com>
>> diff --git a/drivers/Kconfig b/drivers/Kconfig
>> index 968bd0a6fd78..453df9e1210d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/Kconfig
>> @@ -241,4 +241,6 @@ source "drivers/peci/Kconfig"
>>
>> source "drivers/hte/Kconfig"
>>
>> +source "drivers/dpll/Kconfig"
>> +
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/Makefile b/drivers/Makefile
>> index 20b118dca999..9ffb554507ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/Makefile
>> @@ -194,3 +194,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MOST) += most/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_PECI) += peci/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HTE) += hte/
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_ACCEL) += accel/
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DPLL) += dpll/
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/Kconfig b/drivers/dpll/Kconfig
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..a4cae73f20d3
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/Kconfig
>> @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>> +#
>> +# Generic DPLL drivers configuration
>> +#
>> +
>> +config DPLL
>> + bool
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/Makefile b/drivers/dpll/Makefile
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d3926f2a733d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/Makefile
>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +#
>> +# Makefile for DPLL drivers.
>> +#
>> +
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DPLL) += dpll_sys.o
>
> What's "sys" and why is it here?
It's an object file for the subsystem. Could be useful if we will have drivers
for DPLL-only devices.
>> +dpll_sys-y += dpll_core.o
>> +dpll_sys-y += dpll_netlink.o
>> +dpll_sys-y += dpll_nl.o
>> +
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..3fc151e16751
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,835 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * dpll_core.c - Generic DPLL Management class support.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>
> IIUC, there's a lot of Intel work behind this, I think some credits
> should go here as well.
>
> Also, it is 2023, you live in the past :)
Yeah, that's true. Have to improve it. As well as in other files.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>> +
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/string.h>
>> +
>> +#include "dpll_core.h"
>> +
>> +DEFINE_MUTEX(dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +DEFINE_MUTEX(dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> +
>> +DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(dpll_device_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>> +DEFINE_XARRAY_FLAGS(dpll_pin_xa, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>> +
>> +#define ASSERT_DPLL_REGISTERED(d) \
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>> +#define ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(d) \
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, (d)->id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>> +
>> +static struct class dpll_class = {
>> + .name = "dpll",
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_get_by_id - find dpll device by it's id
>> + * @id: id of searched dpll
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * dpll_device struct if found
>> + * * NULL otherwise
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_device *dpll = NULL;
>> +
>> + if (xa_get_mark(&dpll_device_xa, id, DPLL_REGISTERED))
>> + dpll = xa_load(&dpll_device_xa, id);
> return xa_load
>
>> +
> return NULL
>
>> + return dpll;
>
> Anyway, I believe this fuction should go away, see below.
Don't think it matters, but happy to remove the function.
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_get_by_name - find dpll device by it's id
>> + * @bus_name: bus name of searched dpll
>> + * @dev_name: dev name of searched dpll
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * dpll_device struct if found
>> + * * NULL otherwise
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_device *
>> +dpll_device_get_by_name(const char *bus_name, const char *device_name)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_device *dpll, *ret = NULL;
>> + unsigned long index;
>> +
>> + xa_for_each_marked(&dpll_device_xa, index, dpll, DPLL_REGISTERED) {
>> + if (!strcmp(dev_bus_name(&dpll->dev), bus_name) &&
>> + !strcmp(dev_name(&dpll->dev), device_name)) {
>> + ret = dpll;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_xa_ref_pin_add - add pin reference to a given xarray
>> + * @xa_pins: dpll_pin_ref xarray holding pins
>> + * @pin: pin being added
>> + * @ops: ops for a pin
>> + * @priv: pointer to private data of owner
>> + *
>> + * Allocate and create reference of a pin or increase refcount on existing pin
>> + * reference on given xarray.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 on success
>> + * * -ENOMEM on failed allocation
>> + */
>> +static int
>> +dpll_xa_ref_pin_add(struct xarray *xa_pins, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin_ops *ops, void *priv)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
>> + unsigned long i;
>
> In previous function you use "index" name for the same variable. Be
> consistent. I think "i" is actually better.
>
Yep, agree.
>
>> + u32 idx;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + xa_for_each(xa_pins, i, ref) {
>> + if (ref->pin == pin) {
>> + refcount_inc(&ref->refcount);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + ref = kzalloc(sizeof(*ref), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ref)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + ref->pin = pin;
>> + ref->ops = ops;
>> + ref->priv = priv;
>> + ret = xa_alloc(xa_pins, &idx, ref, xa_limit_16b, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ret)
>> + refcount_set(&ref->refcount, 1);
>> + else
>> + kfree(ref);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_xa_ref_pin_del - remove reference of a pin from xarray
>> + * @xa_pins: dpll_pin_ref xarray holding pins
>> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
>> + *
>> + * Decrement refcount of existing pin reference on given xarray.
>> + * If all references are dropped, delete the reference and free its memory.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 on success
>> + * * -EINVAL if reference to a pin was not found
>> + */
[...]
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_alloc - allocate the memory for dpll device
>> + * @clock_id: clock_id of creator
>> + * @dev_driver_id: id given by dev driver
>> + * @module: reference to registering module
>> + *
>> + * Allocates memory and initialize dpll device, hold its reference on global
>> + * xarray.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * dpll_device struct pointer if succeeded
>> + * * ERR_PTR(X) - failed allocation
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_device *
>> +dpll_device_alloc(const u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module)
>
> This should be static. Didn't you get warn?
I did get an email from kernel test robot. I'll make it static. As well as
dpll_pin_alloc()
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_device *dpll;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + dpll = kzalloc(sizeof(*dpll), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!dpll)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + refcount_set(&dpll->refcount, 1);
>> + dpll->dev.class = &dpll_class;
>> + dpll->dev_driver_id = dev_driver_id;
>> + dpll->clock_id = clock_id;
>> + dpll->module = module;
>> + ret = xa_alloc(&dpll_device_xa, &dpll->id, dpll,
>> + xa_limit_16b, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + kfree(dpll);
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> + }
>> + xa_init_flags(&dpll->pin_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>> +
>> + return dpll;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_get - find existing or create new dpll device
>> + * @clock_id: clock_id of creator
>> + * @dev_driver_id: id given by dev driver
>> + * @module: reference to registering module
>> + *
>> + * Get existing object of a dpll device, unique for given arguments.
>> + * Create new if doesn't exist yet.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * valid dpll_device struct pointer if succeeded
>> + * * ERR_PTR of an error
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_device *
>> +dpll_device_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_device *dpll, *ret = NULL;
>> + unsigned long index;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + xa_for_each(&dpll_device_xa, index, dpll) {
>> + if (dpll->clock_id == clock_id &&
>> + dpll->dev_driver_id == dev_driver_id &&
>
> Why you need "dev_driver_id"? clock_id is here for the purpose of
> identification, isn't that enough for you.
dev_driver_id is needed to provide several DPLLs from one device. In ice driver
implementation there are 2 different DPLLs - to recover from PPS input and to
recover from Sync-E. I believe there is only one clock, that's why clock id is
the same for both of them. But Arkadiusz can tell more about it.
>
> Plus, the name is odd. "dev_driver" should certainly be avoided.
Simply id doesn't tell anything either. dpll_dev_id?
>> + dpll->module == module) {
>> + ret = dpll;
>> + refcount_inc(&ret->refcount);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = dpll_device_alloc(clock_id, dev_driver_id, module);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_get);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_put - decrease the refcount and free memory if possible
>> + * @dpll: dpll_device struct pointer
>> + *
>> + * Drop reference for a dpll device, if all references are gone, delete
>> + * dpll device object.
>> + */
>> +void dpll_device_put(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>> +{
>> + if (!dpll)
>> + return;
>
> Remove this check. The driver should not call this with NULL.
Well, netdev_put() has this kind of check. As well as spi_dev_put() or
i2c_put_adapter() at least. Not sure I would like to avoid a bit of safety.
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&dpll->refcount)) {
>> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!xa_empty(&dpll->pin_refs));
>
> ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(dpll);
Good point!
>> + xa_destroy(&dpll->pin_refs);
>> + xa_erase(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id);
>> + kfree(dpll);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_put);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_register - register the dpll device in the subsystem
>> + * @dpll: pointer to a dpll
>> + * @type: type of a dpll
>> + * @ops: ops for a dpll device
>> + * @priv: pointer to private information of owner
>> + * @owner: pointer to owner device
>> + *
>> + * Make dpll device available for user space.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 on success
>> + * * -EINVAL on failure
>> + */
>> +int dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, enum dpll_type type,
>> + struct dpll_device_ops *ops, void *priv,
>> + struct device *owner)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON(!ops || !owner))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + if (WARN_ON(type <= DPLL_TYPE_UNSPEC || type > DPLL_TYPE_MAX))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + if (ASSERT_DPLL_NOT_REGISTERED(dpll)) {
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + return -EEXIST;
>> + }
>> + dpll->dev.bus = owner->bus;
>> + dpll->parent = owner;
>> + dpll->type = type;
>> + dpll->ops = ops;
>> + dev_set_name(&dpll->dev, "%s_%d", dev_name(owner),
>> + dpll->dev_driver_id);
>
> This is really odd. As a result, the user would see something like:
> pci/0000:01:00.0_1
> pci/0000:01:00.0_2
>
> I have to say it is confusing. In devlink, is bus/name and the user
> could use this info to look trough sysfs. Here, 0000:01:00.0_1 is not
> there. Also, "_" might have some meaning on some bus. Should not
> concatename dev_name() with anything.
>
> Thinking about this some more, the module/clock_id tuple should be
> uniqueue and stable. It is used for dpll_device_get(), it could be used
> as the user handle, can't it?
> Example:
> ice/c92d02a7129f4747
> mlx5/90265d8bf6e6df56
>
> If you really need the "dev_driver_id" (as I believe clock_id should be
> enough), you can put it here as well:
> ice/c92d02a7129f4747/1
> ice/c92d02a7129f4747/2
>
Looks good, will change it
> This would also be beneficial for mlx5, as mlx5 with 2 PFs would like to
> share instance of DPLL equally, there is no "one clock master". >
>> + dpll->priv = priv;
>> + xa_set_mark(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id, DPLL_REGISTERED);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + dpll_notify_device_create(dpll);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_register);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_unregister - deregister dpll device
>> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
>> + *
>> + * Deregister device, make it unavailable for userspace.
>> + * Note: It does not free the memory
>> + */
>> +void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + ASSERT_DPLL_REGISTERED(dpll);
>> + xa_clear_mark(&dpll_device_xa, dpll->id, DPLL_REGISTERED);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + dpll_notify_device_delete(dpll);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_unregister);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_alloc - allocate the memory for dpll pin
>> + * @clock_id: clock_id of creator
>> + * @dev_driver_id: id given by dev driver
>> + * @module: reference to registering module
>> + * @prop: dpll pin properties
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * valid allocated dpll_pin struct pointer if succeeded
>> + * * ERR_PTR of an error
>
> Extra "*"'s
Ok, I can re-format the comments across the files.
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_pin *
>> +dpll_pin_alloc(u64 clock_id, u8 device_drv_id, struct module *module,
>
> Odd whitespace.
>
> Also, func should be static.
>
Fixed.
>
>> + const struct dpll_pin_properties *prop)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin *pin;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + pin = kzalloc(sizeof(*pin), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pin)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> + pin->dev_driver_id = device_drv_id;
>
> Name inconsistency: driver/drv
> you have it on multiple places
>
Changed it every where, thanks for spotting.
>
>> + pin->clock_id = clock_id;
>> + pin->module = module;
>> + refcount_set(&pin->refcount, 1);
>> + if (WARN_ON(!prop->description)) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto release;
>> + }
>> + pin->prop.description = kstrdup(prop->description, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pin->prop.description) {
>> + ret = -ENOMEM;
>> + goto release;
>> + }
>> + if (WARN_ON(prop->type <= DPLL_PIN_TYPE_UNSPEC ||
>> + prop->type > DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MAX)) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto release;
>> + }
>> + pin->prop.type = prop->type;
>> + pin->prop.capabilities = prop->capabilities;
>> + pin->prop.freq_supported = prop->freq_supported;
>> + pin->prop.any_freq_min = prop->any_freq_min;
>> + pin->prop.any_freq_max = prop->any_freq_max;
>
> Make sure that the driver maintains prop (static const) and just save
> the pointer. Prop does not need to be something driver needs to change.
>
What's the difference? For ptp_ocp, we have the same configuration for all
ext pins and the allocator only changes the name of the pin. Properties of
the DPLL pins are stored within the pin object, not the driver, in this case.
Not sure if the pointer way is much better...
>
>> + xa_init_flags(&pin->dpll_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>> + xa_init_flags(&pin->parent_refs, XA_FLAGS_ALLOC);
>> + ret = xa_alloc(&dpll_pin_xa, &pin->idx, pin,
>> + xa_limit_16b, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +release:
>> + if (ret) {
>> + xa_destroy(&pin->dpll_refs);
>> + xa_destroy(&pin->parent_refs);
>> + kfree(pin->prop.description);
>> + kfree(pin->rclk_dev_name);
>> + kfree(pin);
>> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return pin;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_get - find existing or create new dpll pin
>> + * @clock_id: clock_id of creator
>> + * @dev_driver_id: id given by dev driver
>> + * @module: reference to registering module
>> + * @prop: dpll pin properties
>> + *
>> + * Get existing object of a pin (unique for given arguments) or create new
>> + * if doesn't exist yet.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * valid allocated dpll_pin struct pointer if succeeded
>> + * * ERR_PTR of an error
>
> This is one example, I'm pretty sure that there are others, when you
> have text inconsistencies in func doc for the same function in .c and .h
> Have it please only on one place. .c is the usual place.
>
Yep, will clear .h files.
>
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_pin *
>> +dpll_pin_get(u64 clock_id, u32 device_drv_id, struct module *module,
>
> Again, why do you need this device_drv_id? Clock id should be enough.
>
I explained the reason earlier, but the naming is fixed.
>
>> + const struct dpll_pin_properties *prop)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin *pos, *ret = NULL;
>> + unsigned long index;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + xa_for_each(&dpll_pin_xa, index, pos) {
>> + if (pos->clock_id == clock_id &&
>> + pos->dev_driver_id == device_drv_id &&
>> + pos->module == module) {
>
> Compare prop as well.
>
> Can't the driver_id (pin index) be something const as well? I think it
> should. And therefore it could be easily put inside.
>
I think clock_id + dev_driver_id + module should identify the pin exactly. And
now I think that *prop is not needed here at all. Arkadiusz, any thoughts?
>
>> + ret = pos;
>> + refcount_inc(&ret->refcount);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (!ret)
>> + ret = dpll_pin_alloc(clock_id, device_drv_id, module, prop);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_get);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_put - decrease the refcount and free memory if possible
>> + * @dpll: dpll_device struct pointer
>> + *
>> + * Drop reference for a pin, if all references are gone, delete pin object.
>> + */
>> +void dpll_pin_put(struct dpll_pin *pin)
>> +{
>> + if (!pin)
>> + return;
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pin->refcount)) {
>> + xa_destroy(&pin->dpll_refs);
>> + xa_destroy(&pin->parent_refs);
>> + xa_erase(&dpll_pin_xa, pin->idx);
>> + kfree(pin->prop.description);
>> + kfree(pin->rclk_dev_name);
>> + kfree(pin);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_put);
>> +
>> +static int
>> +__dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin_ops *ops, void *priv,
>> + const char *rclk_device_name)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (rclk_device_name && !pin->rclk_dev_name) {
>> + pin->rclk_dev_name = kstrdup(rclk_device_name, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!pin->rclk_dev_name)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> + ret = dpll_xa_ref_pin_add(&dpll->pin_refs, pin, ops, priv);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto rclk_free;
>> + ret = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_add(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll, ops, priv);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto ref_pin_del;
>> + else
>> + dpll_pin_notify(dpll, pin, DPLL_A_PIN_IDX);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> +ref_pin_del:
>> + dpll_xa_ref_pin_del(&dpll->pin_refs, pin);
>> +rclk_free:
>> + kfree(pin->rclk_dev_name);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_register - register the dpll pin in the subsystem
>> + * @dpll: pointer to a dpll
>> + * @pin: pointer to a dpll pin
>> + * @ops: ops for a dpll pin ops
>> + * @priv: pointer to private information of owner
>> + * @rclk_device: pointer to recovered clock device
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 on success
>> + * * -EINVAL - missing dpll or pin
>> + * * -ENOMEM - failed to allocate memory
>> + */
>> +int
>> +dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin_ops *ops, void *priv,
>> + struct device *rclk_device)
>
> Wait a second, what is this "struct device *"? Looks very odd.
>
>
>> +{
>> + const char *rclk_name = rclk_device ? dev_name(rclk_device) : NULL;
>
> If you need to store something here, store the pointer to the device
> directly. But this rclk_device seems odd to me.
> Dev_name is in case of PCI device for example 0000:01:00.0? That alone
> is incomplete. What should it server for?
>
Well, these questions go to Arkadiusz...
>
>
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!dpll))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + if (WARN_ON(!pin))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>
> Remove these checks and other similar checks in the code. It should rely
> on basic driver sanity.
>
Ok...
>
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + ret = __dpll_pin_register(dpll, pin, ops, priv, rclk_name);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_register);
>> +
>> +static void
>> +__dpll_pin_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin)
>> +{
>> + dpll_xa_ref_pin_del(&dpll->pin_refs, pin);
>> + dpll_xa_ref_dpll_del(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_unregister - deregister dpll pin from dpll device
>> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
>> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
>> + *
>> + * Note: It does not free the memory
>> + */
>> +int dpll_pin_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON(xa_empty(&dpll->pin_refs)))
>> + return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + __dpll_pin_unregister(dpll, pin);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_unregister);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_pin_register - register a pin with a parent pin
>> + * @parent: pointer to a parent pin
>> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
>> + * @ops: ops for a dpll pin
>> + * @priv: pointer to private information of owner
>> + * @rclk_device: pointer to recovered clock device
>> + *
>> + * Register a pin with a parent pin, create references between them and
>> + * between newly registered pin and dplls connected with a parent pin.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 on success
>> + * * -EINVAL missing pin or parent
>> + * * -ENOMEM failed allocation
>> + * * -EPERM if parent is not allowed
>> + */
>> +int
>> +dpll_pin_on_pin_register(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin_ops *ops, void *priv,
>> + struct device *rclk_device)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
>> + unsigned long i, stop;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (WARN_ON(!pin || !parent))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + if (WARN_ON(parent->prop.type != DPLL_PIN_TYPE_MUX))
>> + return -EPERM;
>
> I don't think that EPERM is suitable for this. Just use EINVAL. The
> driver is buggy in this case anyway.
>
Ok.
>
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + ret = dpll_xa_ref_pin_add(&pin->parent_refs, parent, ops, priv);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unlock;
>> + refcount_inc(&pin->refcount);
>> + xa_for_each(&parent->dpll_refs, i, ref) {
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + ret = __dpll_pin_register(ref->dpll, pin, ops, priv,
>> + rclk_device ?
>> + dev_name(rclk_device) : NULL);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + stop = i;
>> + goto dpll_unregister;
>> + }
>> + dpll_pin_parent_notify(ref->dpll, pin, parent, DPLL_A_PIN_IDX);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> +dpll_unregister:
>> + xa_for_each(&parent->dpll_refs, i, ref) {
>> + if (i < stop) {
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + __dpll_pin_unregister(ref->dpll, pin);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + refcount_dec(&pin->refcount);
>> + dpll_xa_ref_pin_del(&pin->parent_refs, parent);
>> +unlock:
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_on_pin_register);
Now I realised that this function can bring us to ABBA deadlock with mutexes..
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister - deregister dpll pin from a parent pin
>> + * @parent: pointer to a parent pin
>> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
>> + *
>> + * Note: It does not free the memory
>> + */
>> +void dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
>> + unsigned long i;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + dpll_xa_ref_pin_del(&pin->parent_refs, parent);
>> + refcount_dec(&pin->refcount);
>> + xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, i, ref) {
>> + __dpll_pin_unregister(ref->dpll, pin);
>> + dpll_pin_parent_notify(ref->dpll, pin, parent,
>> + DPLL_A_PIN_IDX);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_get_by_idx - find a pin ref on dpll by pin index
>> + * @dpll: dpll device pointer
>> + * @idx: index of pin
>> + *
>> + * Find a reference to a pin registered with given dpll and return its pointer.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * valid pointer if pin was found
>> + * * NULL if not found
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_pin *dpll_pin_get_by_idx(struct dpll_device *dpll, u32 idx)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *pos;
>> + unsigned long i;
>> +
>> + xa_for_each(&dpll->pin_refs, i, pos) {
>> + if (pos && pos->pin && pos->pin->dev_driver_id == idx)
>
> How exactly pos->pin could be NULL?
>
> Also, you are degrading the xarray to a mere list here with lookup like
> this. Why can't you use the pin index coming from driver and
> insert/lookup based on this index?
>
Good point. We just have to be sure, that drivers provide 0-based indexes for
their pins. I'll re-think it.
>
>> + return pos->pin;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_priv - get the dpll device private owner data
>> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
>> + *
>> + * Return: pointer to the data
>> + */
>> +void *dpll_priv(const struct dpll_device *dpll)
>> +{
>> + return dpll->priv;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_priv);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv - get the dpll device private owner data
>> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
>> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
>> + *
>> + * Return: pointer to the data
>> + */
>> +void *dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>
> IIUC, you use this helper from dpll ops in drivers to get per dpll priv.
> Just pass the priv directly to the op and avoid need for this helper,
> no? Same goes to the rest of the priv helpers.
>
>
>> + const struct dpll_pin *pin)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
>> +
>> + ref = dpll_xa_ref_pin_find((struct xarray *)&dpll->pin_refs, pin);
>
> Why cast is needed here? You have this on multiple places.
>
>
>> + if (!ref)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return ref->priv;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_pin_priv - get the dpll pin private owner data
>> + * @parent: pointer to a parent pin
>> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
>> + *
>> + * Return: pointer to the data
>> + */
>> +void *dpll_pin_on_pin_priv(const struct dpll_pin *parent,
>> + const struct dpll_pin *pin)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
>> +
>> + ref = dpll_xa_ref_pin_find((struct xarray *)&pin->parent_refs, parent);
>> + if (!ref)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return ref->priv;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_pin_on_pin_priv);
>> +
>> +static int __init dpll_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = dpll_netlink_init();
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto error;
>> +
>> + ret = class_register(&dpll_class);
>
> Why exactly do you need this? I asked to remove this previously, IIRC
> you said you would check if this needed. Why?
>
Ah, sorry. Removed it now.
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unregister_netlink;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +unregister_netlink:
>> + dpll_netlink_finish();
>> +error:
>> + mutex_destroy(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + mutex_destroy(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +subsys_initcall(dpll_init);
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..876b6ac6f3a0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_core.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __DPLL_CORE_H__
>> +#define __DPLL_CORE_H__
>> +
>> +#include <linux/dpll.h>
>> +#include <linux/refcount.h>
>> +#include "dpll_netlink.h"
>> +
>> +#define DPLL_REGISTERED XA_MARK_1
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct dpll_device - structure for a DPLL device
>> + * @id: unique id number for each device
>> + * @dev_driver_id: id given by dev driver
>> + * @dev: struct device for this dpll device
>> + * @parent: parent device
>> + * @module: module of creator
>> + * @ops: operations this &dpll_device supports
>> + * @lock: mutex to serialize operations
>> + * @type: type of a dpll
>> + * @priv: pointer to private information of owner
>> + * @pins: list of pointers to pins registered with this dpll
>> + * @clock_id: unique identifier (clock_id) of a dpll
>> + * @mode_supported_mask: mask of supported modes
>> + * @refcount: refcount
>> + **/
>> +struct dpll_device {
>> + u32 id;
>> + u32 dev_driver_id;
>> + struct device dev;
>> + struct device *parent;
>> + struct module *module;
>> + struct dpll_device_ops *ops;
>> + enum dpll_type type;
>> + void *priv;
>> + struct xarray pin_refs;
>> + u64 clock_id;
>> + unsigned long mode_supported_mask;
>> + refcount_t refcount;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct dpll_pin - structure for a dpll pin
>> + * @idx: unique idx given by alloc on global pin's XA
>> + * @dev_driver_id: id given by dev driver
>> + * @clock_id: clock_id of creator
>> + * @module: module of creator
>> + * @dpll_refs: hold referencees to dplls that pin is registered with
>> + * @pin_refs: hold references to pins that pin is registered with
>> + * @prop: properties given by registerer
>> + * @rclk_dev_name: holds name of device when pin can recover clock from it
>> + * @refcount: refcount
>> + **/
>> +struct dpll_pin {
>> + u32 idx;
>> + u32 dev_driver_id;
>> + u64 clock_id;
>> + struct module *module;
>
> Have the ordering of common fields, like clock_id and module consistent
> with struct dpll_device
>
Re-arranged it a bit.
>
>> + struct xarray dpll_refs;
>> + struct xarray parent_refs;
>> + struct dpll_pin_properties prop;
>> + char *rclk_dev_name;
>> + refcount_t refcount;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct dpll_pin_ref - structure for referencing either dpll or pins
>> + * @dpll: pointer to a dpll
>> + * @pin: pointer to a pin
>> + * @ops: ops for a dpll pin
>> + * @priv: pointer to private information of owner
>> + **/
>> +struct dpll_pin_ref {
>> + union {
>> + struct dpll_device *dpll;
>> + struct dpll_pin *pin;
>> + };
>> + struct dpll_pin_ops *ops;
>> + void *priv;
>> + refcount_t refcount;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_id(int id);
>> +struct dpll_device *dpll_device_get_by_name(const char *bus_name,
>> + const char *dev_name);
>> +struct dpll_pin *dpll_pin_get_by_idx(struct dpll_device *dpll, u32 idx);
>> +struct dpll_pin_ref *
>> +dpll_xa_ref_pin_find(struct xarray *xa_refs, const struct dpll_pin *pin);
>> +struct dpll_pin_ref *
>> +dpll_xa_ref_dpll_find(struct xarray *xa_refs, const struct dpll_device *dpll);
>> +extern struct xarray dpll_device_xa;
>> +extern struct xarray dpll_pin_xa;
>> +extern struct mutex dpll_device_xa_lock;
>> +extern struct mutex dpll_pin_xa_lock;
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..46aefeb1ac93
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1065 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Generic netlink for DPLL management framework
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>> + *
>> + */
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <net/genetlink.h>
>> +#include "dpll_core.h"
>> +#include "dpll_nl.h"
>> +#include <uapi/linux/dpll.h>
>> +
>> +static u32 dpll_pin_freq_value[] = {
>> + [DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_1_HZ] = DPLL_PIN_FREQ_1_HZ,
>> + [DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_10_MHZ] = DPLL_PIN_FREQ_10_MHZ,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dpll_msg_add_dev_handle(struct sk_buff *msg, const struct dpll_device *dpll)
>> +{
>> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_ID, dpll->id))
>
> Why exactly do we need this dua--handle scheme? Why do you need
> unpredictable DPLL_A_ID to be exposed to userspace?
> It's just confusing.
>
To be able to work with DPLL per integer after iterator on the list deducts
which DPLL device is needed. It can reduce the amount of memory copies and
simplify comparisons. Not sure why it's confusing.
>
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLL_A_BUS_NAME, dev_bus_name(&dpll->dev)))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLL_A_DEV_NAME, dev_name(&dpll->dev)))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
[...]
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dpll_msg_add_pins_on_pin(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref = NULL;
>
> Why this needs to be initialized?
>
No need, fixed.
>
>> + enum dpll_pin_state state;
>> + struct nlattr *nest;
>> + unsigned long index;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + xa_for_each(&pin->parent_refs, index, ref) {
>> + if (WARN_ON(!ref->ops->state_on_pin_get))
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + ret = ref->ops->state_on_pin_get(pin, ref->pin, &state,
>> + extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + nest = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT);
>> + if (!nest)
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_IDX,
>> + ref->pin->dev_driver_id)) {
>> + ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>> + goto nest_cancel;
>> + }
>> + if (nla_put_u8(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_STATE, state)) {
>> + ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>> + goto nest_cancel;
>> + }
>> + nla_nest_end(msg, nest);
>> + }
>
> How is this function different to dpll_msg_add_pin_parents()?
> Am I lost? To be honest, this x_on_pin/dpll, parent, refs dance is quite
> hard to follow for me :/
>
> Did you get lost here as well? If yes, this needs some serious think
> through :)
>
Let's re-think it again. Arkadiuzs, do you have clear explanation of the
relationship between these things?
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +nest_cancel:
>> + nla_nest_cancel(msg, nest);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dpll_msg_add_pin_dplls(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
>> + struct nlattr *attr;
>> + unsigned long index;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + xa_for_each(&pin->dpll_refs, index, ref) {
>> + attr = nla_nest_start(msg, DPLL_A_DEVICE);
>> + if (!attr)
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_dev_handle(msg, ref->dpll);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto nest_cancel;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_on_dpll_state(msg, pin, ref, extack);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + goto nest_cancel;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_prio(msg, pin, ref, extack);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + goto nest_cancel;
>> + nla_nest_end(msg, attr);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +nest_cancel:
>> + nla_nest_end(msg, attr);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dpll_cmd_pin_on_dpll_get(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_IDX, pin->dev_driver_id))
>
> Is it "ID" or "INDEX" (IDX). Please make this consistent in the whole
> code.
>
I believe it's INDEX which is provided by the driver. I'll think about renaming,
but suggestions are welcome.
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_DESCRIPTION, pin->prop.description))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_u8(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_TYPE, pin->prop.type))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_DPLL_CAPS, pin->prop.capabilities))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_direction(msg, pin, extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_freq(msg, pin, extack, true);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + return ret;
>> + ref = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_find(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll);
>> + if (!ref)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_prio(msg, pin, ref, extack);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + return ret;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_on_dpll_state(msg, pin, ref, extack);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + return ret;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_parents(msg, pin, extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + if (pin->rclk_dev_name)
>> + if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_RCLK_DEVICE,
>> + pin->rclk_dev_name))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +__dpll_cmd_pin_dump_one(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, bool dump_dpll)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_IDX, pin->dev_driver_id))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_DESCRIPTION, pin->prop.description))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + if (nla_put_u8(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_TYPE, pin->prop.type))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_direction(msg, pin, extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_freq(msg, pin, extack, true);
>> + if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> + return ret;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pins_on_pin(msg, pin, extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + if (!xa_empty(&pin->dpll_refs) && dump_dpll) {
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_dplls(msg, pin, extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + if (pin->rclk_dev_name)
>> + if (nla_put_string(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_RCLK_DEVICE,
>> + pin->rclk_dev_name))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> Lots of code duplication with the previous functions, please unify.
>
Agree, have done it.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
[...]
>> +static int
>> +dpll_pin_set_from_nlattr(struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + struct dpll_pin *pin, struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> + enum dpll_pin_state state = DPLL_PIN_STATE_UNSPEC;
>> + u32 parent_idx = PIN_IDX_INVALID;
>
> You just need this PIN_IDX_INVALID define internally in this function,
> change the flow to avoid a need for it.
>
I'll re-think it, thanks.
>
>> + int rem, ret = -EINVAL;
>> + struct nlattr *a;
>> +
>> + nla_for_each_attr(a, genlmsg_data(info->genlhdr),
>> + genlmsg_len(info->genlhdr), rem) {
>
> This is odd. Why you iterace over attrs? Why don't you just access them
> directly, like attrs[DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY] for example?
>
I had some unknown crashes when I was using such access. I might have lost some
checks, will try it again.
>
>> + switch (nla_type(a)) {
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY:
>> + ret = dpll_pin_freq_set(pin, a, info->extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_DIRECTION:
>> + ret = dpll_pin_direction_set(pin, a, info->extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_PRIO:
>> + ret = dpll_pin_prio_set(dpll, pin, a, info->extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_IDX:
>> + parent_idx = nla_get_u32(a);
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_STATE:
>> + state = nla_get_u8(a);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (state != DPLL_PIN_STATE_UNSPEC) {
>
> Again, change the flow to:
> if (attrs[DPLL_A_PIN_STATE]) {
>
> and avoid need for this value set/check.
>
Yep, will try.
>
>> + if (parent_idx == PIN_IDX_INVALID) {
>> + ret = dpll_pin_state_set(dpll, pin, state,
>> + info->extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + } else {
>> + ret = dpll_pin_on_pin_state_set(dpll, pin, parent_idx,
>> + state, info->extack);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
[...]
>> +int dpll_pre_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_post_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> +{
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_pin_pre_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> + int ret = dpll_pre_doit(ops, skb, info);
>> + struct dpll_device *dpll;
>> + struct dpll_pin *pin;
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + dpll = info->user_ptr[0];
>> + if (!info->attrs[DPLL_A_PIN_IDX]) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto unlock_dev;
>> + }
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + pin = dpll_pin_get_by_idx(dpll,
>> + nla_get_u32(info->attrs[DPLL_A_PIN_IDX]));
>> + if (!pin) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto unlock_pin;
>> + }
>> + info->user_ptr[1] = pin;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +unlock_pin:
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> +unlock_dev:
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_device_xa_lock);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void dpll_pin_post_doit(const struct genl_split_ops *ops, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> + struct genl_info *info)
>> +{
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> + dpll_post_doit(ops, skb, info);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_pin_pre_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> +{
>> + mutex_lock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>
> ABBA deadlock here, see dpll_pin_register() for example where the lock
> taking order is opposite.
>
Now I see an ABBA deadlock here, as well as in function before. Not sure how to
solve it here. Any thoughts?
>
>> +
>> + return dpll_pre_dumpit(cb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_pin_post_dumpit(struct netlink_callback *cb)
>> +{
>> + mutex_unlock(&dpll_pin_xa_lock);
>> +
>> + return dpll_post_dumpit(cb);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dpll_event_device_change(struct sk_buff *msg, struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + struct dpll_pin *pin, struct dpll_pin *parent,
>> + enum dplla attr)
>> +{
>> + int ret = dpll_msg_add_dev_handle(msg, dpll);
>> + struct dpll_pin_ref *ref = NULL;
>> + enum dpll_pin_state state;
>> +
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + if (pin && nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_IDX, pin->dev_driver_id))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> I don't really understand why you are trying figure something new and
> interesting with the change notifications. This object mix and random
> attrs fillup is something very wrong and makes userspace completely
> fuzzy about what it is getting. And yet it is so simple:
> You have 2 objects, dpll and pin, please just have:
> dpll_notify()
> dpll_pin_notify()
> and share the attrs fillup code with pin_get() and dpll_get() callbacks.
> No need for any smartness. Have this dumb and simple.
>
> Think about it more as about "object-state-snapshot" than "atomic-change"
But with full object-snapshot user space app will lose the information about
what exactly has changed. The reason to have this event is to provide the
attributes which have changed. Otherwise, the app should have full snapshot and
compare all attributes to figure out changes and that's might not be great idea.
>
>> +
>> + switch (attr) {
>> + case DPLL_A_MODE:
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_mode(msg, dpll, NULL);
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_SOURCE_PIN_IDX:
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_source_pin_idx(msg, dpll, NULL);
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_LOCK_STATUS:
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_lock_status(msg, dpll, NULL);
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_TEMP:
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_temp(msg, dpll, NULL);
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_FREQUENCY:
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_freq(msg, pin, NULL, false);
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_PRIO:
>> + ref = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_find(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll);
>> + if (!ref)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_prio(msg, pin, ref, NULL);
>> + break;
>> + case DPLL_A_PIN_STATE:
>> + if (parent) {
>> + ref = dpll_xa_ref_pin_find(&pin->parent_refs, parent);
>> + if (!ref)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + if (!ref->ops || !ref->ops->state_on_pin_get)
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + ret = ref->ops->state_on_pin_get(pin, parent, &state,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + if (nla_put_u32(msg, DPLL_A_PIN_PARENT_IDX,
>> + parent->dev_driver_id))
>> + return -EMSGSIZE;
>> + } else {
>> + ref = dpll_xa_ref_dpll_find(&pin->dpll_refs, dpll);
>> + if (!ref)
>> + return -EFAULT;
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_pin_on_dpll_state(msg, pin, ref,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dpll_send_event_create(enum dpll_event event, struct dpll_device *dpll)
>> +{
>> + struct sk_buff *msg;
>> + int ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>> + void *hdr;
>> +
>> + msg = genlmsg_new(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!msg)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, 0, 0, &dpll_nl_family, 0, event);
>> + if (!hdr)
>> + goto out_free_msg;
>> +
>> + ret = dpll_msg_add_dev_handle(msg, dpll);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out_cancel_msg;
>> + genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>> + genlmsg_multicast(&dpll_nl_family, msg, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +out_cancel_msg:
>> + genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>> +out_free_msg:
>> + nlmsg_free(msg);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +dpll_send_event_change(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin *parent, enum dplla attr)
>> +{
>> + struct sk_buff *msg;
>> + int ret = -EMSGSIZE;
>> + void *hdr;
>> +
>> + msg = genlmsg_new(NLMSG_GOODSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!msg)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + hdr = genlmsg_put(msg, 0, 0, &dpll_nl_family, 0,
>> + DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CHANGE);
>
> I don't really get it. Why exactly you keep having this *EVENT* cmds?
> Why per-object NEW/GET/DEL cmds shared with get genl op are not enough?
> I have to be missing something.
Changes might come from other places, but will affect the DPLL device and we
have to notify users in this case.
>
>
>> + if (!hdr)
>> + goto out_free_msg;
>> +
>> + ret = dpll_event_device_change(msg, dpll, pin, parent, attr);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out_cancel_msg;
>> + genlmsg_end(msg, hdr);
>> + genlmsg_multicast(&dpll_nl_family, msg, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +out_cancel_msg:
>> + genlmsg_cancel(msg, hdr);
>> +out_free_msg:
>> + nlmsg_free(msg);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_device_create(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>> +{
>> + return dpll_send_event_create(DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_CREATE, dpll);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_notify_device_delete(struct dpll_device *dpll)
>> +{
>> + return dpll_send_event_create(DPLL_EVENT_DEVICE_DELETE, dpll);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_device_notify(struct dpll_device *dpll, enum dplla attr)
>> +{
>> + if (WARN_ON(!dpll))
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + return dpll_send_event_change(dpll, NULL, NULL, attr);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dpll_device_notify);
>> +
>> +int dpll_pin_notify(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + enum dplla attr)
>> +{
>> + return dpll_send_event_change(dpll, pin, NULL, attr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int dpll_pin_parent_notify(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin *parent, enum dplla attr)
>> +{
>> + return dpll_send_event_change(dpll, pin, parent, attr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +int __init dpll_netlink_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return genl_register_family(&dpll_nl_family);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void dpll_netlink_finish(void)
>> +{
>> + genl_unregister_family(&dpll_nl_family);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void __exit dpll_netlink_fini(void)
>> +{
>> + dpll_netlink_finish();
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..072efa10f0e6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/dpll/dpll_netlink.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>> + */
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_notify_device_create - notify that the device has been created
>> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 if succeeds, error code otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int dpll_notify_device_create(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>> +
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_notify_device_delete - notify that the device has been deleted
>> + * @dpll: registered dpll pointer
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 if succeeds, error code otherwise.
>> + */
>> +int dpll_notify_device_delete(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>> +
>> +int dpll_pin_notify(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + enum dplla attr);
>> +
>> +int dpll_pin_parent_notify(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin *parent, enum dplla attr);
>> +
>> +int __init dpll_netlink_init(void);
>> +void dpll_netlink_finish(void);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/dpll.h b/include/linux/dpll.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..db98b6d4bb73
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/include/linux/dpll.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,284 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2021 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __DPLL_H__
>> +#define __DPLL_H__
>> +
>> +#include <uapi/linux/dpll.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/netlink.h>
>> +
>> +struct dpll_device;
>> +struct dpll_pin;
>> +
>> +#define PIN_IDX_INVALID ((u32)ULONG_MAX)
>> +
>> +struct dpll_device_ops {
>> + int (*mode_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, enum dpll_mode *mode,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*mode_set)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + const enum dpll_mode mode,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + bool (*mode_supported)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + const enum dpll_mode mode,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*source_pin_idx_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + u32 *pin_idx,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*lock_status_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + enum dpll_lock_status *status,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*temp_get)(const struct dpll_device *dpll, s32 *temp,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct dpll_pin_ops {
>> + int (*frequency_set)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + const u32 frequency,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*frequency_get)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + u32 *frequency, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*direction_set)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + const enum dpll_pin_direction direction,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*direction_get)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + enum dpll_pin_direction *direction,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*state_on_pin_get)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_pin *parent_pin,
>> + enum dpll_pin_state *state,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*state_on_dpll_get)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + enum dpll_pin_state *state,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*state_on_pin_set)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_pin *parent_pin,
>> + const enum dpll_pin_state state,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*state_on_dpll_set)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + const enum dpll_pin_state state,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*prio_get)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + u32 *prio, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> + int (*prio_set)(const struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + const struct dpll_device *dpll,
>> + const u32 prio, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct dpll_pin_properties {
>> + const char *description;
>> + enum dpll_pin_type type;
>> + unsigned long freq_supported;
>> + u32 any_freq_min;
>> + u32 any_freq_max;
>> + unsigned long capabilities;
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum dpll_pin_freq_supp {
>> + DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_UNSPEC = 0,
>> + DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_1_HZ,
>> + DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_10_MHZ,
>> +
>> + __DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_MAX,
>> + DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_MAX = (__DPLL_PIN_FREQ_SUPP_MAX - 1)
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_get - find or create dpll_device object
>> + * @clock_id: a system unique number for a device
>> + * @dev_driver_idx: index of dpll device on parent device
>> + * @module: register module
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + * * pointer to initialized dpll - success
>> + * * NULL - memory allocation fail
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_device
>> +*dpll_device_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_put - caller drops reference to the device, free resources
>> + * @dpll: dpll device pointer
>> + *
>> + * If all dpll_device_get callers drops their reference, the dpll device
>> + * resources are freed.
>> + */
>> +void dpll_device_put(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_register - register device, make it visible in the subsystem.
>> + * @dpll: reference previously allocated with dpll_device_get
>> + * @type: type of dpll
>> + * @ops: callbacks
>> + * @priv: private data of registerer
>> + * @owner: device struct of the owner
>> + *
>> + */
>> +int dpll_device_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, enum dpll_type type,
>> + struct dpll_device_ops *ops, void *priv,
>> + struct device *owner);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_unregister - deregister registered dpll
>> + * @dpll: pointer to dpll
>> + *
>> + * Unregister the dpll from the subsystem, make it unavailable for netlink
>> + * API users.
>> + */
>> +void dpll_device_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_priv - get dpll private data
>> + * @dpll: pointer to dpll
>> + *
>> + * Obtain private data pointer passed to dpll subsystem when allocating
>> + * device with ``dpll_device_alloc(..)``
>> + */
>> +void *dpll_priv(const struct dpll_device *dpll);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_pin_priv - get pin on pin pair private data
>> + * @parent: pointer to a parent pin
>> + * @pin: pointer to a dpll_pin
>> + *
>> + * Obtain private pin data pointer passed to dpll subsystem when pin
>> + * was registered with parent pin.
>> + */
>> +void *dpll_pin_on_pin_priv(const struct dpll_pin *parent, const struct dpll_pin *pin);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv - get pin on dpll pair private data
>> + * @dpll: pointer to dpll
>> + * @pin: pointer to a dpll_pin
>> + *
>> + * Obtain private pin-dpll pair data pointer passed to dpll subsystem when pin
>> + * was registered with a dpll.
>> + */
>> +void *dpll_pin_on_dpll_priv(const struct dpll_device *dpll, const struct dpll_pin *pin);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_get - get reference or create new pin object
>> + * @clock_id: a system unique number of a device
>> + * @dev_driver_idx: index of dpll device on parent device
>> + * @module: register module
>> + * @pin_prop: constant properities of a pin
>> + *
>> + * find existing pin with given clock_id, dev_driver_idx and module, or create new
>> + * and returen its reference.
>> + *
>> + * Returns:
>> + * * pointer to initialized pin - success
>> + * * NULL - memory allocation fail
>> + */
>> +struct dpll_pin
>> +*dpll_pin_get(u64 clock_id, u32 dev_driver_id, struct module *module,
>
> Name inconsistency: dev_driver_id/idx in comment
>
>
>> + const struct dpll_pin_properties *pin_prop);
>
> In .c you call this "prop", be consistent.
>
Fixed both.
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_register - register pin with a dpll device
>> + * @dpll: pointer to dpll object to register pin with
>> + * @pin: pointer to allocated pin object being registered with dpll
>> + * @ops: struct with pin ops callbacks
>> + * @priv: private data pointer passed when calling callback ops
>> + * @rclk_device: pointer to device struct if pin is used for recovery of a clock
>> + * from that device
>> + *
>> + * Register previously allocated pin object with a dpll device.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 - if pin was registered with a parent pin,
>> + * * -ENOMEM - failed to allocate memory,
>> + * * -EEXIST - pin already registered with this dpll,
>> + * * -EBUSY - couldn't allocate id for a pin.
>> + */
>> +int dpll_pin_register(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin_ops *ops, void *priv,
>> + struct device *rclk_device);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_unregister - deregister pin from a dpll device
>> + * @dpll: pointer to dpll object to deregister pin from
>> + * @pin: pointer to allocated pin object being deregistered from dpll
>> + *
>> + * Deregister previously registered pin object from a dpll device.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 - pin was successfully deregistered from this dpll device,
>> + * * -ENXIO - given pin was not registered with this dpll device,
>> + * * -EINVAL - pin pointer is not valid.
>> + */
>> +int dpll_pin_unregister(struct dpll_device *dpll, struct dpll_pin *pin);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_put - drop reference to a pin acquired with dpll_pin_get
>> + * @pin: pointer to allocated pin
>> + *
>> + * Pins shall be deregistered from all dpll devices before putting them,
>> + * otherwise the memory won't be freed.
>> + */
>> +void dpll_pin_put(struct dpll_pin *pin);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_pin_register - register a pin to a muxed-type pin
>> + * @parent: parent pin pointer
>> + * @pin: pointer to allocated pin object being registered with a parent pin
>> + * @ops: struct with pin ops callbacks
>> + * @priv: private data pointer passed when calling callback ops
>> + * @rclk_device: pointer to device struct if pin is used for recovery of a clock
>> + * from that device
>> + *
>> + * In case of multiplexed pins, allows registring them under a single
>> + * parent pin.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 - if pin was registered with a parent pin,
>> + * * -ENOMEM - failed to allocate memory,
>> + * * -EEXIST - pin already registered with this parent pin,
>> + */
>> +int dpll_pin_on_pin_register(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin,
>> + struct dpll_pin_ops *ops, void *priv,
>> + struct device *rclk_device);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_pin_on_pin_register - register a pin to a muxed-type pin
>> + * @parent: parent pin pointer
>> + * @pin: pointer to allocated pin object being registered with a parent pin
>> + * @ops: struct with pin ops callbacks
>> + * @priv: private data pointer passed when calling callback ops
>> + * @rclk_device: pointer to device struct if pin is used for recovery of a clock
>> + * from that device
>> + *
>> + * In case of multiplexed pins, allows registring them under a single
>> + * parent pin.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 - if pin was registered with a parent pin,
>> + * * -ENOMEM - failed to allocate memory,
>> + * * -EEXIST - pin already registered with this parent pin,
>> + */
>> +void dpll_pin_on_pin_unregister(struct dpll_pin *parent, struct dpll_pin *pin);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * dpll_device_notify - notify on dpll device change
>> + * @dpll: dpll device pointer
>> + * @attr: changed attribute
>> + *
>> + * Broadcast event to the netlink multicast registered listeners.
>> + *
>> + * Return:
>> + * * 0 - success
>> + * * negative - error
>> + */
>> +int dpll_device_notify(struct dpll_device *dpll, enum dplla attr);
>> +
>> +
>> +#endif
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list