[PATCH 1/3] drivers/perf: imx_ddr: Add support for NXP i.MX9 SoC DDRC PMU driver

Xu Yang xu.yang_2 at nxp.com
Sun Mar 12 20:27:08 PDT 2023


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Li <frank.li at nxp.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2023 1:50 AM
> To: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2 at nxp.com>; will at kernel.org; mark.rutland at arm.com; robh+dt at kernel.org;
> shawnguo at kernel.org; festevam at gmail.com
> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3] drivers/perf: imx_ddr: Add support for NXP i.MX9 SoC DDRC PMU driver
> 
> > +static u64 ddr_perf_read_counter(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int counter)
> > +{
> > +	u32 val_lower, val_upper;
> > +	u64 val;
> > +
> > +	if (counter == CYCLES_COUNTER) {
> > +		val_upper = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMC(counter) +
> > 0x4);
> > +		val_lower = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMC(counter));
> > +		val = val_upper;
> > +		val = (val << 32);
> > +		val |= val_lower;
> 
> Read 64bit counter value need use below logic
> 
> do{
> 	val_upper = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMC(counter) + 0x4);
> 	val_lower = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMC(counter));
> while( val_upper != readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMC(counter) + 0x4));
> 
> assume upper is 0,  when cpu read lower register, upper may change to 1,
> so you will get wrong 64bit value.

Yes, agree with you. Will improve it in next version.

Thanks,
Xu Yang

> 
> Frank
> 
> > +	} else {
> > +		val = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMC(counter));
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return val;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_counter_global_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, bool
> > enable)
> > +{
> > +	u32 ctrl;
> > +
> > +	ctrl = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMGC0);
> > +
> > +	if (enable) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * The performance monitor must be reset before event
> > counting
> > +		 * sequences. The performance monitor can be reset by first
> > freezing
> > +		 * one or more counters and then clearing the freeze
> > condition to
> > +		 * allow the counters to count according to the settings in the
> > +		 * performance monitor registers. Counters can be frozen
> > individually
> > +		 * by setting PMLCAn[FC] bits, or simultaneously by setting
> > PMGC0[FAC].
> > +		 * Simply clearing these freeze bits will then allow the
> > performance
> > +		 * monitor to begin counting based on the register settings.
> > +		 */
> > +		ctrl |= PMGC0_FAC;
> > +		writel(ctrl, pmu->base + PMGC0);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Freeze all counters disabled, interrupt enabled, and freeze
> > +		 * counters on condition enabled.
> > +		 */
> > +		ctrl &= ~PMGC0_FAC;
> > +		ctrl |= PMGC0_PMIE | PMGC0_FCECE;
> > +		writel(ctrl, pmu->base + PMGC0);
> > +	} else {
> > +		ctrl |= PMGC0_FAC;
> > +		ctrl &= ~(PMGC0_PMIE | PMGC0_FCECE);
> > +		writel(ctrl, pmu->base + PMGC0);
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_counter_local_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int config,
> > +				    int counter, bool enable)
> > +{
> > +	u32 ctrl_a;
> > +
> > +	ctrl_a = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMLCA(counter));
> > +
> > +	if (enable) {
> > +		ctrl_a |= PMLCA_FC;
> > +		writel(ctrl_a, pmu->base + PMLCA(counter));
> > +
> > +		ddr_perf_clear_counter(pmu, counter);
> > +
> > +		/* Freeze counter disabled, condition enabled, and program
> > event.*/
> > +		ctrl_a &= ~PMLCA_FC;
> > +		ctrl_a |= PMLCA_CE;
> > +		ctrl_a &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMLCA_EVENT, 0x7F);
> > +		ctrl_a |= FIELD_PREP(PMLCA_EVENT, (config & 0x000000FF));
> > +		writel(ctrl_a, pmu->base + PMLCA(counter));
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* Freeze counter. */
> > +		ctrl_a |= PMLCA_FC;
> > +		writel(ctrl_a, pmu->base + PMLCA(counter));
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_monitor_config(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, int cfg, int cfg1,
> > int cfg2)
> > +{
> > +	u32 pmcfg1, pmcfg2;
> > +	int event, counter;
> > +
> > +	event = cfg & 0x000000FF;
> > +	counter = (cfg & 0x0000FF00) >> 8;
> > +
> > +	pmcfg1 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> > +
> > +	if (counter == 2 && event == 73)
> > +		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> > +	else if (counter == 2 && event != 73)
> > +		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> > +
> > +	if (counter == 3 && event == 73)
> > +		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> > +	else if (counter == 3 && event != 73)
> > +		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_WR_TRANS_FILT_EN;
> > +
> > +	if (counter == 4 && event == 73)
> > +		pmcfg1 |= PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> > +	else if (counter == 4 && event != 73)
> > +		pmcfg1 &= ~PMCFG1_RD_BT_FILT_EN;
> > +
> > +	pmcfg1 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, 0x3FFFF);
> > +	pmcfg1 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG1_ID_MASK, cfg2);
> > +	writel(pmcfg1, pmu->base + PMCFG1);
> > +
> > +	pmcfg2 = readl_relaxed(pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> > +	pmcfg2 &= ~FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, 0x3FFFF);
> > +	pmcfg2 |= FIELD_PREP(PMCFG2_ID, cfg1);
> > +	writel(pmcfg2, pmu->base + PMCFG2);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = to_ddr_pmu(event->pmu);
> > +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > +	int counter = hwc->idx;
> > +	u64 new_raw_count;
> > +
> > +	new_raw_count = ddr_perf_read_counter(pmu, counter);
> > +	local64_add(new_raw_count, &event->count);
> > +
> > +	/* clear counter's value every time */
> > +	ddr_perf_clear_counter(pmu, counter);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ddr_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = to_ddr_pmu(event->pmu);
> > +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > +	struct perf_event *sibling;
> > +
> > +	if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
> > +		return -ENOENT;
> > +
> > +	if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state &
> > PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	if (event->cpu < 0) {
> > +		dev_warn(pmu->dev, "Can't provide per-task data!\n");
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We must NOT create groups containing mixed PMUs, although
> > software
> > +	 * events are acceptable (for example to create a CCN group
> > +	 * periodically read when a hrtimer aka cpu-clock leader triggers).
> > +	 */
> > +	if (event->group_leader->pmu != event->pmu &&
> > +			!is_software_event(event->group_leader))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event->group_leader) {
> > +		if (sibling->pmu != event->pmu &&
> > +				!is_software_event(sibling))
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	event->cpu = pmu->cpu;
> > +	hwc->idx = -1;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = to_ddr_pmu(event->pmu);
> > +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > +	int counter = hwc->idx;
> > +
> > +	local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, 0);
> > +
> > +	ddr_perf_counter_local_config(pmu, event->attr.config, counter,
> > true);
> > +	hwc->state = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ddr_perf_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = to_ddr_pmu(event->pmu);
> > +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > +	int cfg = event->attr.config;
> > +	int cfg1 = event->attr.config1;
> > +	int cfg2 = event->attr.config2;
> > +	int counter;
> > +
> > +	counter = (cfg & 0x0000FF00) >> 8;
> > +
> > +	pmu->events[counter] = event;
> > +	pmu->active_events++;
> > +	hwc->idx = counter;
> > +	hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > +
> > +	if (flags & PERF_EF_START)
> > +		ddr_perf_event_start(event, flags);
> > +
> > +	/* read trans, write trans, read beat */
> > +	ddr_perf_monitor_config(pmu, cfg, cfg1, cfg2);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = to_ddr_pmu(event->pmu);
> > +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > +	int counter = hwc->idx;
> > +
> > +	ddr_perf_counter_local_config(pmu, event->attr.config, counter,
> > false);
> > +	ddr_perf_event_update(event);
> > +
> > +	hwc->state |= PERF_HES_STOPPED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_event_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = to_ddr_pmu(event->pmu);
> > +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> > +
> > +	ddr_perf_event_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
> > +
> > +	pmu->active_events--;
> > +	hwc->idx = -1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_pmu_enable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu);
> > +
> > +	ddr_perf_counter_global_config(ddr_pmu, true);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_pmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *ddr_pmu = to_ddr_pmu(pmu);
> > +
> > +	ddr_perf_counter_global_config(ddr_pmu, false);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ddr_perf_init(struct ddr_pmu *pmu, void __iomem *base,
> > +			 struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	*pmu = (struct ddr_pmu) {
> > +		.pmu = (struct pmu) {
> > +			.module       = THIS_MODULE,
> > +			.capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE,
> > +			.task_ctx_nr  = perf_invalid_context,
> > +			.attr_groups  = attr_groups,
> > +			.event_init   = ddr_perf_event_init,
> > +			.add          = ddr_perf_event_add,
> > +			.del          = ddr_perf_event_del,
> > +			.start        = ddr_perf_event_start,
> > +			.stop         = ddr_perf_event_stop,
> > +			.read         = ddr_perf_event_update,
> > +			.pmu_enable   = ddr_perf_pmu_enable,
> > +			.pmu_disable  = ddr_perf_pmu_disable,
> > +		},
> > +		.base = base,
> > +		.dev = dev,
> > +	};
> > +}
> > +
> > +static irqreturn_t ddr_perf_irq_handler(int irq, void *p)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = (struct ddr_pmu *)p;
> > +	struct perf_event *event;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Counters can generate an interrupt on an overflow when msb of a
> > +	 * counter changes from 0 to 1. For the interrupt to be signalled,
> > +	 * below condition mush be satisfied:
> > +	 * PMGC0[PMIE] = 1, PMGC0[FCECE] = 1, PMLCAn[CE] = 1
> > +	 * When an interrupt is signalled, PMGC0[FAC] is set by hardware and
> > +	 * all of the registers are frozen.
> > +	 * Software can clear the interrupt condition by resetting the
> > performance
> > +	 * monitor and clearing the most significant bit of the counter that
> > +	 * generate the overflow.
> > +	 */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_COUNTERS; i++) {
> > +		if (!pmu->events[i])
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		event = pmu->events[i];
> > +
> > +		ddr_perf_event_update(event);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ddr_perf_counter_global_config(pmu, true);
> > +
> > +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ddr_perf_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, struct ddr_pmu,
> > node);
> > +	int target;
> > +
> > +	if (cpu != pmu->cpu)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	target = cpumask_any_but(cpu_online_mask, cpu);
> > +	if (target >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	perf_pmu_migrate_context(&pmu->pmu, cpu, target);
> > +	pmu->cpu = target;
> > +
> > +	WARN_ON(irq_set_affinity(pmu->irq, cpumask_of(pmu->cpu)));
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ddr_perf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu;
> > +	void __iomem *base;
> > +	int ret, irq;
> > +	char *name;
> > +
> > +	base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(base))
> > +		return PTR_ERR(base);
> > +
> > +	pmu = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!pmu)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	ddr_perf_init(pmu, base, &pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +	pmu->devtype_data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu);
> > +
> > +	pmu->id = ida_simple_get(&ddr_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	name = devm_kasprintf(&pdev->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
> > DDR_PERF_DEV_NAME "%d", pmu->id);
> > +	if (!name) {
> > +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +		goto format_string_err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pmu->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> > +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state_multi(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN,
> > DDR_CPUHP_CB_NAME,
> > +				      NULL, ddr_perf_offline_cpu);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to add callbacks for multi
> > state\n");
> > +		goto cpuhp_state_err;
> > +	}
> > +	pmu->cpuhp_state = ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Register the pmu instance for cpu hotplug */
> > +	ret = cpuhp_state_add_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu-
> > >node);
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Error %d registering hotplug\n", ret);
> > +		goto cpuhp_instance_err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Request irq */
> > +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +	if (irq < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get irq: %d", irq);
> > +		ret = irq;
> > +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ddr_perf_irq_handler,
> > +			       IRQF_NOBALANCING | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
> > +			       DDR_CPUHP_CB_NAME, pmu);
> > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Request irq failed: %d", ret);
> > +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	pmu->irq = irq;
> > +	ret = irq_set_affinity(pmu->irq, cpumask_of(pmu->cpu));
> > +	if (ret) {
> > +		dev_err(pmu->dev, "Failed to set interrupt affinity\n");
> > +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	ret = perf_pmu_register(&pmu->pmu, name, -1);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		goto ddr_perf_err;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +
> > +ddr_perf_err:
> > +	cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu-
> > >node);
> > +cpuhp_instance_err:
> > +	cpuhp_remove_multi_state(pmu->cpuhp_state);
> > +cpuhp_state_err:
> > +format_string_err:
> > +	ida_simple_remove(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
> > +	dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "i.MX9 DDR Perf PMU failed (%d),
> > disabled\n", ret);
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ddr_perf_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct ddr_pmu *pmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > +	cpuhp_state_remove_instance_nocalls(pmu->cpuhp_state, &pmu-
> > >node);
> > +	cpuhp_remove_multi_state(pmu->cpuhp_state);
> > +
> > +	perf_pmu_unregister(&pmu->pmu);
> > +
> > +	ida_simple_remove(&ddr_ida, pmu->id);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver imx_ddr_pmu_driver = {
> > +	.driver         = {
> > +		.name                = "imx9-ddr-pmu",
> > +		.of_match_table      = imx_ddr_pmu_dt_ids,
> > +		.suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> > +	},
> > +	.probe          = ddr_perf_probe,
> > +	.remove         = ddr_perf_remove,
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(imx_ddr_pmu_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xu Yang <xu.yang_2 at nxp.com>");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DDRC PerfMon for i.MX9 SoCs");
> > --
> > 2.34.1




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list