[PATCH 4/8] dt-bindings: iio: st-sensors: Add IIS328DQ accelerometer

Jonathan Cameron jic23 at kernel.org
Sat Mar 11 10:06:40 PST 2023


On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 18:27:53 +0100
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren at i2se.com> wrote:

> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Am 07.03.23 um 09:23 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> > On 06/03/2023 18:22, Stefan Wahren wrote:  
> >> From: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren at chargebyte.com>
> >>
> >> The ST IIS328DQ is an accelerometer sensor compatible with
> >> the existing ST sensor binding.  
> > If it is compatible with existing binding, then make it compatible.
> > Although your driver change suggests it is not compatible...  
> since the policy is to make the compatible so specific as possible, i 
> will fix the wording here.

Driver changes are naming only - which we do want as that isn't discoverable
from the device but it will 'work' fine with a fallback compatible of
st,h3lis331dl-accel be it with wrong device naming exposed to userspace.

Hmm. That shouldn't have the postfix as it's not a multi device package
(which are the cases where we need postfix as they have multiple drivers
binding to different independent things in the one package / part number)

If someone wants to add a compatible of st,h3lis331dl and deprecate
the accel variant that would be fine, but wouldn't help us much here
for a fallback compatible and it's probably not worth the effort.

Historically we've not been doing fallback compatibles right in this
driver but it's probably not worth 'fixing' that for old devices
as the only real benefit would be things working nicely with old kernels.
Nice to not make it worse though.

So I'd like to see this fallback to st,h3lis331dl-accel

Jonathan


> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel  




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list