[PATCH v2 03/18] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mediatek,mt8365-pinctrl: add drive strength property

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Fri Mar 10 01:49:30 PST 2023


Il 10/03/23 10:46, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
> Il 10/03/23 09:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>> On 07/03/2023 14:17, Alexandre Mergnat wrote:
>>> This SoC is able to drive the following output current:
>>> - 2 mA
>>> - 4 mA
>>> - 6 mA
>>> - 8 mA
>>> - 10 mA
>>> - 12 mA
>>> - 14 mA
>>> - 16 mA
>>>
>>> Then drive-strength property is set with enum to reflect its HW capability.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat at baylibre.com>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8365-pinctrl.yaml | 3 +++
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git 
>>> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8365-pinctrl.yaml 
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8365-pinctrl.yaml
>>> index 4b96884a1afc..101871ec6693 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8365-pinctrl.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/mediatek,mt8365-pinctrl.yaml
>>> @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ patternProperties:
>>>             bias-pull-down: true
>>> +          drive-strength:
>>> +            enum: [2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16]
>>
>> Isn't this conflicting with mediatek,drive-strength-adv? Your commit msg
>> suggests you add a missing property, but I would say nothing was missing
>> here.
>>
>> You need review from (pinctrl) Mediatek maintainers how the bindings for
>> all Mediateks are organized.
> 
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> mediatek,drive-strength-adv *shall not exist*, that was an unnecessary property
> that leaked upstream from downstream kernels and there's no reason to use it.
> 
> Upstream, we have drive-strength-microamp and mediatek,rsel-resistance-in-si-unit.
> 
> Since mediatek,mt8365-pinctrl.yaml got picked with that property already, I have
> nothing to complain about this specific commit... drive-strength does not conflict
> with the mediatek,drive-strength-adv property, as the "adv" is for microamp
> adjustments.
> 
> You can pick it, it's fine.
> 
> Anyway, Alexandre: can you please perform a cleanup to the MT8365 pinctrl binding?
> The cleanup means you're setting mediatek,drive-strength-adv as deprecated and
> adding the right properties (...and possibly changing the devicetrees to use it).
> 
> For more information, you can look at commit history for the (unfortunately, named
> incorrectly) MT8195 pinctrl documentation: bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8195.yaml
> where we performed the same cleanup that I'm asking you to do, except we didn't
> have to set any property as deprecated because there was *no devicetree upstream*
> that was actually using that property (hence not an ABI breakage).
> 
> Cheers!
> Angelo

Sorry for the double email. I forgot to give my:

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>

Whoops!
Cheers again  :-)




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list