[PATCH v1 2/3] cpufreq: mediatek: fix KP caused by handler usage after regulator_put/clk_put
Dan Carpenter
error27 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 10 01:11:41 PST 2023
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 01:17:49PM +0800, jia-wei.chang wrote:
> From: "Jia-Wei Chang" <jia-wei.chang at mediatek.com>
>
> Any kind of failure in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init() will lead to calling
> regulator_put() or clk_put() and the KP will occur since the regulator/clk
> handlers are used after released in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release().
>
This patch is harmless but it's not required.
If the mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init() function is not able to complete
successfully then it cleans up all the partial allocations. If it is
able to allocate everything successfully, then the caller, which is
mtk_cpufreq_probe(), adds it to the &dvfs_info_list. If the
probe() function is not able to complete successfully it releases
everything in the &dvfs_info_list.
In this way, mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init() never frees anything which has
not been allocated and it never frees anything which has already been
freed. All the IS_ERR() checks in mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_release() can be
removed.
In reviewing this code, I can't help but notice that mtk_cpu_dvfs_info_init()
is buggy. Please read my blog on error handling:
https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/04/28/free-the-last-thing-style/
drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq.c
411 info->cpu_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "cpu");
412 if (IS_ERR(info->cpu_clk)) {
413 ret = PTR_ERR(info->cpu_clk);
414 return dev_err_probe(cpu_dev, ret,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Here we have a direct return which means there is nothing to free.
Okay.
415 "cpu%d: failed to get cpu clk\n", cpu);
416 }
417
418 info->inter_clk = clk_get(cpu_dev, "intermediate");
419 if (IS_ERR(info->inter_clk)) {
420 ret = PTR_ERR(info->inter_clk);
421 dev_err_probe(cpu_dev, ret,
422 "cpu%d: failed to get intermediate clk\n", cpu);
423 goto out_free_resources;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The last thing we successfully allocated was ->cpu_clk so ideally the
goto would be something like "goto put_cpu_clk;". Let's assume this
clk_get() fails.
424 }
425
426 info->proc_reg = regulator_get_optional(cpu_dev, "proc");
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Note that this is where ->proc_reg is allocated. Prior to that point
it is NULL because it's allocated with kzalloc().
427 if (IS_ERR(info->proc_reg)) {
428 ret = PTR_ERR(info->proc_reg);
429 dev_err_probe(cpu_dev, ret,
430 "cpu%d: failed to get proc regulator\n", cpu);
431 goto out_free_resources;
432 }
[ snip ]
536 out_free_resources:
537 if (regulator_is_enabled(info->proc_reg))
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oops! This is a NULL dereference because ->proc_reg wasn't allocated
yet.
538 regulator_disable(info->proc_reg);
539 if (info->sram_reg && regulator_is_enabled(info->sram_reg))
540 regulator_disable(info->sram_reg);
541
542 if (!IS_ERR(info->proc_reg))
543 regulator_put(info->proc_reg);
544 if (!IS_ERR(info->sram_reg))
545 regulator_put(info->sram_reg);
546 if (!IS_ERR(info->cpu_clk))
547 clk_put(info->cpu_clk);
548 if (!IS_ERR(info->inter_clk))
549 clk_put(info->inter_clk);
550
551 return ret;
552 }
It would be safer and more readable to have:
err_put_inter_clk:
clk_put(info->inter_clk);
err_put_cpu_clk:
clk_put(info->cpu_clk);
etc.
regards,
dan carpenter
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list