[net-next PATCH 09/11] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: add LEDs definition example

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 08/03/2023 20:02, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 07:49:26PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 08/03/2023 14:57, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 11:58:33AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 07/03/2023 18:00, Christian Marangi wrote:
>>>>> Add LEDs definition example for qca8k Switch Family to describe how they
>>>>> should be defined for a correct usage.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Where is the changelog? This was v8 already! What happened with all
>>>> review, changes?
>>>
>>> Did you read patch 0?
>>>
>>> We have decided to start again, starting small and working up. This
>>> patchset just adds plain, boring LEDs. No acceleration, on hardware
>>> offload. Just on/off, and fixed blink.
>>
>> Sure, but the patch is carried over. So what happened with all its
>> feedback? Was there or was not? How can we know?
>>
> 
> The history of the old series is a bit sad, not enough review, another
> dev asking for a different implementation and me doing an hybrid to
> reach a common point (and then disappear intro oblivion)...
> 
> Short story is that this current series have nothing related to the HW
> offload feature and only in v7 it was asked to put the LED nodes in
> ethernet-phy.yaml
> 
> I can put in the cover letter of v2 of this series the changelog of the
> previous series but they would only be related to other part that are
> not related to this.
> 
> Just to give you some context and explain why the changelog was dropped.

I am less interested in the changelog of entire patchset but of the
patches which are for me to review. Sending vX as v1 suggests that all
previous review work on this patch could be in some limbo state. Maybe
nothing happened in all previous version, but it's now my task to dig it?

This is why you have "---" for the patch changelog.

Best regards,
Krzysztof