[PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix event queue overflow acknowledgment
Robin Murphy
robin.murphy at arm.com
Wed Mar 8 05:08:24 PST 2023
On 2023-03-08 09:20, Tomas Krcka wrote:
> When an overflow occurs in the event queue, the SMMU toggles overflow
> flag OVFLG in the PROD register.
> The evtq thread is supposed to acknowledge the overflow flag by toggling
> flag OVACKFLG in the CONS register, otherwise the overflow condition is
> still active (OVFLG != OVACKFLG).
>
> Currently the acknowledge register is toggled after clearing the event
> queue but is never propagated to the hardware. It would be done next
> time when executing evtq thread.
>
> The SMMU still adds elements to the queue when the overflow condition is
> active but any subsequent overflow information after clearing the event
> queue will be lost.
>
> This change keeps the SMMU in sync as it's expected by design.
If I've understood correctly, the upshot of this is that if the queue
has overflowed once, become empty, then somehow goes from empty to full
before we manage to consume a single event, we won't print the "events
lost" message a second time.
Have you seen this happen in practice? TBH if the event queue ever
overflows even once it's indicative that the system is hosed anyway, so
it's not clear to me that there's any great loss of value in sometimes
failing to repeat a warning for a chronic ongoing operational failure.
It could be argued that we have a subtle inconsistency between
arm_smmu_evtq_thread() and arm_smmu_priq_thread() here, but the fact is
that the Event queue and PRI queue *do* have different overflow
behaviours, so it could equally be argued that inconsistency in the code
helps reflect that. FWIW I can't say I have a strong preference either way.
Thanks,
Robin.
> Signed-off-by: Tomas Krcka <krckatom at amazon.de>
> Suggested-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed at amazon.de>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index f2425b0f0cd6..acc1ff5ff69b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1579,6 +1579,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
> /* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
> llq->cons = Q_OVF(llq->prod) | Q_WRP(llq, llq->cons) |
> Q_IDX(llq, llq->cons);
> + queue_sync_cons_out(q);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list