[GIT PULL] intel-gpio for 6.3-1

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:42 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:09 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, at 23:35, andy.shevchenko at gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij kirjoitti:
> > > >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > >> <andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers et al.,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Combined series to clean up headers in the GPIO library and drivers.
> > > >> > Along with it, drop a few unused legacy APIs.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > This tag is immutable, enjoy!
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks for coordinating and getting this sorted and tested Andy, perfect
> > > >> job as always!
> > > >
> > > > You're welcome!
> > > >
> > > >> > intel-gpio for v6.3-1
> > > >>
> > > >> But I think you mean it for v6.4?
> > > >
> > > > Well, techically speaking it didn't make v6.3-rc1 due to cross-dependencies.
> > > > Starting from it it may be applied to v6.3 or to v6.4.
> > > >
> > > > Up to you and Bart, but I prefer not to rebrand the tag, if it's an option.
> > >
> > > I think it was clear that this would not make it into 6.3 after
> > > the decision to rebase on top of 6.3-rc1. However, the tag name
> > > and description both look like they make sense for 6.4 the way
> > > you wrote them.
> >
> > Okay, I will rre-tag this.
>
> Now it's tagged as intel-gpio-v6.4-1. Should I send a new PR?
>

Yes, please.

Bart