[REPOST PATCH 13/16] selftests: KVM: aarch64: Test chained events for PMU

[Reiji Watanabe]

HI Raghu,


On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 5:07 PM Raghavendra Rao Ananta
<rananta at google.com> wrote:
>
> Extend the vPMU's vCPU migration test to validate
> chained events, and their overflow conditions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta at google.com>
> ---
>  .../testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c
> index 066dc17fa3906..de725f4339ad5 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_test.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
>   * migrating the guest vCPU to random pCPUs in the system, and check
>   * if the vPMU is still behaving as expected. The sub-tests include
>   * testing basic functionalities such as basic counters behavior,
> - * overflow, and overflow interrupts.
> + * overflow, overflow interrupts, and chained events.
>   *
>   * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
>   *
> @@ -61,6 +61,8 @@
>  #define PRE_OVERFLOW_32                (GENMASK(31, 0) - COUNT_TO_OVERFLOW + 1)
>  #define PRE_OVERFLOW_64                (GENMASK(63, 0) - COUNT_TO_OVERFLOW + 1)
>
> +#define ALL_SET_64             GENMASK(63, 0)
> +
>  #define GICD_BASE_GPA  0x8000000ULL
>  #define GICR_BASE_GPA  0x80A0000ULL
>
> @@ -639,6 +641,75 @@ static void test_cycles_count(bool expect_count, bool test_overflow)
>         pmu_disable_reset();
>  }
>
> +static void test_chained_count(int pmc_idx)
> +{
> +       int i, chained_pmc_idx;
> +       struct pmc_accessor *acc;
> +       uint64_t pmcr_n, cnt, cntr_val;
> +
> +       /* The test needs at least two PMCs */
> +       pmcr_n = get_pmcr_n();
> +       GUEST_ASSERT_1(pmcr_n >= 2, pmcr_n);

Nit: As the architecture doesn't require this, rather than causing the
test failure, I would suggest gracefully skipping this test case or
make this the requirement of the test.

Thanks,
Reiji


> +
> +       /*
> +        * The chained counter's idx is always chained with (pmc_idx + 1).
> +        * pmc_idx should be even as the chained event doesn't count on
> +        * odd numbered counters.
> +        */
> +       GUEST_ASSERT_1(pmc_idx % 2 == 0, pmc_idx);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * The max counter idx that the chained counter can occupy is
> +        * (pmcr_n - 1), while the actual event sits on (pmcr_n - 2).
> +        */
> +       chained_pmc_idx = pmc_idx + 1;
> +       GUEST_ASSERT(chained_pmc_idx < pmcr_n);
> +
> +       enable_counter(chained_pmc_idx);
> +       pmu_irq_init(chained_pmc_idx);
> +
> +       /* Configure the chained event using all the possible ways*/
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
> +               acc = &pmc_accessors[i];
> +
> +               /* Test if the chained counter increments when the base event overflows */
> +
> +               cntr_val = 1;
> +               acc->write_cntr(chained_pmc_idx, cntr_val);
> +               acc->write_typer(chained_pmc_idx, ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CHAIN);
> +
> +               /* Chain the counter with pmc_idx that's configured for an overflow */
> +               test_instructions_count(pmc_idx, true, true);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * pmc_idx is also configured to run for all the ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors)
> +                * combinations. Hence, the chained chained_pmc_idx is expected to be
> +                * cntr_val + ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors).
> +                */
> +               cnt = acc->read_cntr(chained_pmc_idx);
> +               GUEST_ASSERT_4(cnt == cntr_val + ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors),
> +                               pmc_idx, i, cnt, cntr_val + ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors));
> +
> +               /* Test for the overflow of the chained counter itself */
> +
> +               cntr_val = ALL_SET_64;
> +               acc->write_cntr(chained_pmc_idx, cntr_val);
> +
> +               test_instructions_count(pmc_idx, true, true);
> +
> +               /*
> +                * At this point, an interrupt should've been fired for the chained
> +                * counter (which validates the overflow bit), and the counter should've
> +                * wrapped around to ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors) - 1.
> +                */
> +               cnt = acc->read_cntr(chained_pmc_idx);
> +               GUEST_ASSERT_4(cnt == ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors) - 1,
> +                               pmc_idx, i, cnt, ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors));
> +       }
> +
> +       pmu_irq_exit(chained_pmc_idx);
> +}
> +
>  static void test_event_count(uint64_t event, int pmc_idx, bool expect_count)
>  {
>         switch (event) {
> @@ -665,6 +736,9 @@ static void test_basic_pmu_functionality(void)
>         /* Test overflow with interrupts on generic and cycle counters */
>         test_instructions_count(0, true, true);
>         test_cycles_count(true, true);
> +
> +       /* Test chained events */
> +       test_chained_count(0);
>  }
>
>  /*
> --
> 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
>