[PATCH V2 1/2] mfd: da9062: Remove IRQ requirement
Christoph Niedermaier
cniedermaier at dh-electronics.com
Tue Mar 7 02:17:04 PST 2023
From: Lee Jones [mailto:lee at kernel.org]
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 9:42 AM
>
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2023, Christoph Niedermaier wrote:
>
>> This patch removes the requirement for an IRQ, because for the core
>> functionality IRQ isn't needed. So this makes the DA9061/62 chip
>> useable for designs which haven't connected the IRQ pin.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier at dh-electronics.com>
>> ---
>> Cc: Support Opensource <support.opensource at diasemi.com>
>> Cc: Lee Jones <lee at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource at diasemi.com>
>> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood at gmail.com>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>> Cc: kernel at dh-electronics.com
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> ---
>> V2: - Rebase on current next 20230209
>> - Add Lee Jones to Cc list
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c b/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c
>> index 40cde51e5719..caa597400dd1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c
>> @@ -212,6 +212,27 @@ static const struct mfd_cell da9061_devs[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct mfd_cell da9061_devs_without_irq[] = {
>
> "_noirq"
>
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9061-core",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-regulators",
>> + },
>
> Place the one line entries on one line please.
>
> Even better, use MFD_CELL_NAME()
>
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9061-watchdog",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9061-watchdog",
>> + },
>
> MFD_CELL_OF(<name>, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, <compatible>);
>
I will convert all to MFD_CELL_NAME() in version 3.
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9061-thermal",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9061-thermal",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9061-onkey",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9061-onkey",
>> + },
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct resource da9062_core_resources[] = {
>> DEFINE_RES_NAMED(DA9062_IRQ_VDD_WARN, 1, "VDD_WARN", IORESOURCE_IRQ),
>> };
>> @@ -288,6 +309,35 @@ static const struct mfd_cell da9062_devs[] = {
>> },
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct mfd_cell da9062_devs_without_irq[] = {
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-core",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-regulators",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-watchdog",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9062-watchdog",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-thermal",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9062-thermal",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-rtc",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9062-rtc",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-onkey",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9062-onkey",
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .name = "da9062-gpio",
>> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9062-gpio",
>> + },
>> +};
>
> As above.
>
I will convert all to MFD_CELL_NAME() in version 3.
>> static int da9062_clear_fault_log(struct da9062 *chip)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> @@ -625,7 +675,7 @@ static int da9062_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>> {
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id = i2c_client_get_device_id(i2c);
>> struct da9062 *chip;
>> - unsigned int irq_base;
>> + unsigned int irq_base = 0;
>> const struct mfd_cell *cell;
>> const struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip;
>> const struct regmap_config *config;
>> @@ -645,21 +695,16 @@ static int da9062_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>> i2c_set_clientdata(i2c, chip);
>> chip->dev = &i2c->dev;
>>
>> - if (!i2c->irq) {
>> - dev_err(chip->dev, "No IRQ configured\n");
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - }
>> -
>> switch (chip->chip_type) {
>> case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9061:
>> - cell = da9061_devs;
>> - cell_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da9061_devs);
>> + cell = i2c->irq ? da9061_devs : da9061_devs_without_irq;
>> + cell_num = i2c->irq ? ARRAY_SIZE(da9061_devs) : ARRAY_SIZE(da9061_devs_without_irq);
>
> This is hideous.
>
> Why not just NULLify the resources below instead?
>
>> irq_chip = &da9061_irq_chip;
>> config = &da9061_regmap_config;
>> break;
>> case COMPAT_TYPE_DA9062:
>> - cell = da9062_devs;
>> - cell_num = ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_devs);
>> + cell = i2c->irq ? da9062_devs : da9062_devs_without_irq;
>> + cell_num = i2c->irq ? ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_devs) : ARRAY_SIZE(da9062_devs_without_irq);
> > irq_chip = &da9062_irq_chip;
>
> Still setting this despite no IRQs?
I will take it into account in version 3.
>
>> config = &da9062_regmap_config;
>> break;
> __
> _||_
> \ /
> \/
>
> [...]
>
> if (i2c->irq <= 0)
> cell->resources = NULL;
> cell->num_resources = 0;
But it is an array. I then have to go through it completely and check
if it is related to IRQ. I will try to refactor the my code to be less
hideous and send a version 3.
>
>> @@ -695,29 +740,32 @@ static int da9062_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - ret = da9062_configure_irq_type(chip, i2c->irq, &trigger_type);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to configure IRQ type\n");
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> + if (i2c->irq) {
>> + ret = da9062_configure_irq_type(chip, i2c->irq, &trigger_type);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to configure IRQ type\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> - ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(chip->regmap, i2c->irq,
>> - trigger_type | IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> - -1, irq_chip, &chip->regmap_irq);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to request IRQ %d: %d\n",
>> - i2c->irq, ret);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> + ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(chip->regmap, i2c->irq,
>> + trigger_type | IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + -1, irq_chip, &chip->regmap_irq);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(chip->dev, "Failed to request IRQ %d: %d\n",
>> + i2c->irq, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>>
>> - irq_base = regmap_irq_chip_get_base(chip->regmap_irq);
>> + irq_base = regmap_irq_chip_get_base(chip->regmap_irq);
>> + }
>>
>> ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE, cell,
>> cell_num, NULL, irq_base,
>> NULL);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(chip->dev, "Cannot register child devices\n");
>> - regmap_del_irq_chip(i2c->irq, chip->regmap_irq);
>> + if (i2c->irq)
>> + regmap_del_irq_chip(i2c->irq, chip->regmap_irq);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
Regards
Christoph
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list