[PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: crypto: fsl-sec4: support sec5.4/0 and i.MX6UL
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Fri Mar 3 01:55:23 PST 2023
On 01/03/2023 02:56, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
>
> Add i.MX6UL, SEC 5.0 and SEC 5.4 support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.yaml | 58 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.yaml
> index 678c8389ef49..1b801ae5ab51 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/fsl-sec4.yaml
> @@ -45,8 +45,18 @@ maintainers:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - fsl,sec-v4.0
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,sec-v4.0
> + - items:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,imx6ul-caam
> + - fsl,sec-v5.0
> + - const: fsl,sec-v4.0
> + - items:
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.4
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.0
What's the point of having all these versions? Better to use
SoC-compatibles.
> + - const: fsl,sec-v4.0
>
> "#address-cells":
> const: 1
> @@ -77,6 +87,8 @@ properties:
>
> clock-names:
> oneOf:
> + - items:
> + - const: ipg
> - items:
> - const: mem
> - const: aclk
> @@ -85,11 +97,17 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - const: aclk
> - const: ipg
> + - items:
> + - const: ipg
> + - const: aclk
> - items:
> - const: ipg
> - const: aclk
> - const: mem
>
> + dma-coherent:
> + type: boolean
> +
> fsl,sec-era:
> description:
> Optional. A standard property. Define the 'ERA' of the SEC device.
> @@ -108,8 +126,16 @@ patternProperties:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring
> + - items:
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring
> + - const: fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring
> + - items:
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.4-job-ring
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.0-job-ring
> + - const: fsl,sec-v4.0-job-ring
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
> @@ -148,8 +174,16 @@ patternProperties:
>
> properties:
> compatible:
> - enum:
> - - fsl,sec-v4.0-rtic
> + oneOf:
> + - enum:
> + - fsl,sec-v4.0-rtic
> + - items:
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.0-rtic
> + - const: fsl,sec-v4.0-rtic
> + - items:
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.4-rtic
> + - const: fsl,sec-v5.0-rtic
> + - const: fsl,sec-v4.0-rtic
This is also a bit odd... why do you version children?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list