[RFC PATCH 07/16] dt-bindings: pinctrl: ralink: add new compatible strings

[Arınç ÜNAL]

On 2.03.2023 13:29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/03/2023 11:22, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ## Incorrect naming
>>>>
>>>> MT7620, MT7621, MT7628, and MT7688 SoCs are incorrectly called Ralink,
>>>> introduce new ralink->mediatek compatible strings to address it.
>>>
>>> So this part was addressed by Rob - we don't do it, because it does not
>>> matter. Ralink is now Mediatek, thus there is no conflict and no issues
>>> with different vendor used.
>>
>> I think Rob was rather addressing that updating compatible strings based
>> on acquisition or marketing whims is not permitted. This condition does
>> not apply here as these SoCs were never Ralink.
>>
>> I understand your point that Ralink is now MediaTek but still, calling
>> these SoCs Ralink would be a bit misleading, don't you think?
> 
> Misleading yes, but also does not matter. At least matter not enough to
> justify ABI break, so you would need to deprecate old ones and keep
> everything backwards compatible. You still would affect 3rd party users
> of DTS, though...

I intend to do just that. Introduce new mediatek strings, keep the old 
ones so it's backwards compatible, therefore don't break the ABI.

Instead of deprecating old strings, I intend to introduce the checks I 
mentioned, on the schema, so the pin muxing bindings only apply if the 
DT has got a string that won't match multiple schemas. This way it 
shouldn't affect 3rd party DTs.

Arınç