[PATCH] i2c: xiic: Don't try to handle more interrupt events after error
Robert Hancock
robert.hancock at calian.com
Tue Jun 27 09:13:02 PDT 2023
On Fri, 2023-06-09 at 23:25 +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:32:42PM +0200, wsa at kernel.org wrote:
> >
> > > I think the patch is correct and I will ack it:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at kernel.org>
> > >
> > > I think, though, that this needs a proper fix and testing, in
> > > order to cover all the possible combinations. The scenario you
> > > highlighted is indeed one, but not only, potential situation that
> > > could arise.
> > >
> > > Can I just ask you to write a bit more in the comment to
> > > highlight the possible failure?
> >
> > I tend to apply it to for-current because it improves the
> > situation.
> > Further improvements could be made incrementally? D'accord
> > everyone?
> >
>
> OK with that!
>
> Thanks,
> Andi
Just checking on this patch, was it merged? It shows accepted in
Patchwork, but I'm not seeing it in the Git tree.
--
Robert Hancock <robert.hancock at calian.com>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list