[PATCH v3 3/3] clk: nuvoton: Use clk_parent_data instead of string for parent clock

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Jacky Huang (2023-06-22 07:13:43)
> From: Jacky Huang <ychuang3 at nuvoton.com>
> 
> For the declaration of parent clocks, use struct clk_parent_data instead
> of a string. Due to the change in the passed arguments, replace the usage
> of devm_clk_hw_register_mux() with clk_hw_register_mux_parent_data() for
> all cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jacky Huang <ychuang3 at nuvoton.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c | 306 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 219 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c b/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c
> index 733750dda0f4..f1fe7edd21b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/nuvoton/clk-ma35d1.c
> @@ -63,167 +63,298 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ma35d1_lock);
>  #define PLL_MODE_SS             2
>  
>  static const struct clk_parent_data ca35clk_sel_clks[] = {
> -       { .index = 0 },  /* HXT */
> -       { .index = 1 },  /* CAPLL */
> -       { .index = 2 }   /* DDRPLL */
> +       { .fw_name = "hxt", },
> +       { .fw_name = "capll", },
> +       { .fw_name = "ddrpll", },

Is there any reason why this changed from numbers to strings? It is
faster to directly index vs. access the clock-names property. The
preference is to use the index field and only use fw_name if we're
migrating legacy clk drivers to use DT based lookups.