[PATCH 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters
Jonathan Cameron
Jonathan.Cameron at Huawei.com
Thu Jun 22 01:33:38 PDT 2023
On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:11:39 -0700
Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka at os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
> Generic filters aren't used in all the platforms. Instead, the platforms
> may use different means to filter events. Add support for implementation
> specific filters.
If the specification allows explicitly for non standard ways of controlling filters
it would be good to add a specification reference to this.
Otherwise one question inline.
>
> Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono <bwicaksono at nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka at os.amperecomputing.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++--
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index 0f517152cb4e..fafd734c3218 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,9 @@
>
> static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state;
>
> +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
> +
> static struct acpi_apmt_node *arm_cspmu_apmt_node(struct device *dev)
> {
> return *(struct acpi_apmt_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev);
> @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_type);
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_filter);
> CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_attr_is_visible);
> + CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, set_ev_filter);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -792,7 +796,7 @@ static inline void arm_cspmu_set_event(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> writel(hwc->config, cspmu->base0 + offset);
> }
>
> -static inline void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> +static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
> u32 filter)
> {
> @@ -826,7 +830,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int pmu_flags)
> arm_cspmu_set_cc_filter(cspmu, filter);
> } else {
> arm_cspmu_set_event(cspmu, hwc);
> - arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
> + cspmu->impl.ops.set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
Optional callback so don't you need either provide a default, or check
it isn't null?
> }
>
> hwc->state = 0;
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> index 83df53d1c132..d6d88c246a23 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
> u32 (*event_type)(const struct perf_event *event);
> /* Decode filter value from configs */
> u32 (*event_filter)(const struct perf_event *event);
> + /* Set event filter */
> + void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
> + struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
> /* Hide/show unsupported events */
> umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct attribute *attr, int unused);
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list