[PATCH v5 5/8] soc: mediatek: pm-domains: Unify configuration for infracfg and smi
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com
Mon Jun 19 02:22:18 PDT 2023
Il 19/06/23 10:53, Markus Schneider-Pargmann ha scritto:
> Use flags to distinguish between infracfg and smi subsystem for a bus
> protection configuration. It simplifies enabling/disabling and prepares
> the driver for the use of another regmap for mt8365.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt6795-pm-domains.h | 16 +-
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8167-pm-domains.h | 20 +-
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8173-pm-domains.h | 16 +-
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8183-pm-domains.h | 198 ++++-----
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8186-pm-domains.h | 212 +++++-----
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8188-pm-domains.h | 518 +++++++++++------------
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8192-pm-domains.h | 262 ++++++------
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-pm-domains.h | 464 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.c | 64 ++-
> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h | 37 +-
> 10 files changed, 908 insertions(+), 899 deletions(-)
>
..snip..
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> index 4b6ae56e7c95..356788263db2 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pm-domains.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
> enum scpsys_bus_prot_flags {
> BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE = BIT(1),
> BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK = BIT(2),
> + BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_INFRA = BIT(3),
> + BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_SMI = BIT(4),
> };
>
> #define _BUS_PROT(_set_clr_mask, _set, _clr, _sta_mask, _sta, _flags) { \
> @@ -56,17 +58,30 @@ enum scpsys_bus_prot_flags {
> .flags = _flags \
> }
>
> -#define BUS_PROT_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, 0)
> +#define BUS_PROT_INFRA_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_INFRA)
>
What about doing that like
#define BUS_PROT_WR(_hwip, _mask, _set, _clr, _sta)
_BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_##_hwip)
...so that instead of defining BUS_PROT_INFRA_WR, BUS_PROT_SMI_WR and
BUS_PROT_ANOTHERIP_WR, we keep just one macro?
That'd be then like:
.bp_cfg = {
BUS_PROT_WR(INFRA, MT8183_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_1_DISP,
MT8183_TOP_AXI_PROT_EN_....
....),
BUS_PROT_WR(SMI, MT8183_SMI_COMMON_SMI_CLAMP_DISP,
.....),
}
IMO, that's cleaner, less lines of code and more flexible for eventual
future new variations of that.
Cheers,
Angelo
> -#define BUS_PROT_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK)
> +#define BUS_PROT_INFRA_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, \
> + BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_INFRA | BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK)
>
> -#define BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> - _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
> +#define BUS_PROT_INFRA_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, \
> + BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_INFRA | BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
>
> -#define BUS_PROT_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask) \
> - BUS_PROT_UPDATE(_mask, \
> +#define BUS_PROT_SMI_WR(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_SMI)
> +
> +#define BUS_PROT_SMI_WR_IGN(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, \
> + BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_SMI | BUS_PROT_IGNORE_CLR_ACK)
> +
> +#define BUS_PROT_SMI_UPDATE(_mask, _set, _clr, _sta) \
> + _BUS_PROT(_mask, _set, _clr, _mask, _sta, \
> + BUS_PROT_COMPONENT_SMI | BUS_PROT_REG_UPDATE)
> +
> +#define BUS_PROT_INFRA_UPDATE_TOPAXI(_mask) \
> + BUS_PROT_INFRA_UPDATE(_mask, \
> INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, \
> INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTEN, \
> INFRA_TOPAXI_PROTECTSTA1)
> @@ -90,8 +105,7 @@ struct scpsys_bus_prot_data {
> * @ext_buck_iso_offs: The offset for external buck isolation
> * @ext_buck_iso_mask: The mask for external buck isolation
> * @caps: The flag for active wake-up action.
> - * @bp_infracfg: bus protection for infracfg subsystem
> - * @bp_smi: bus protection for smi subsystem
> + * @bp_cfg: bus protection configuration for any subsystem
> */
> struct scpsys_domain_data {
> const char *name;
> @@ -102,8 +116,7 @@ struct scpsys_domain_data {
> int ext_buck_iso_offs;
> u32 ext_buck_iso_mask;
> u8 caps;
> - const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data bp_infracfg[SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA];
> - const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data bp_smi[SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA];
> + const struct scpsys_bus_prot_data bp_cfg[SPM_MAX_BUS_PROT_DATA];
> int pwr_sta_offs;
> int pwr_sta2nd_offs;
> };
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list