[PATCH] spi: atmel: Prevent false timeouts on long transfers
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Fri Jun 16 09:43:06 PDT 2023
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 06:15:35PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> broonie at kernel.org wrote on Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:20:27 +0100:
> > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 04:12:25PM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > -#define SPI_DMA_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(1000))
> > > +#define SPI_DMA_MIN_TIMEOUT (msecs_to_jiffies(1000))
> > > +#define SPI_DMA_TIMEOUT_PER_10K (msecs_to_jiffies(4))
> > Given that we know the bus speed can't we just calculate this like other
> > drivers do (we should probably add a helper TBH)?
> I agree we should probably have some kind of easy-to-use helper to
> derive a decent timeout value. How do sound the heuristics
> proposed here to you ? That would be:
> timeout = 1s + 4ms/10k
Like I say we should know the transfer speed so we can do better than
4ms/10k - we know how long it takes to clock out each byte, we can just
multiply that by the size of the transfer then add some fudge factor for
setup/teardown overhead. 1s feels pretty generous too. The sun6i
driver for example does
max(tfr->len * 8 * 2 / (tfr->speed_hz / 1000), 100U)
and just doubles the length based timeout with a minimum of 100ms which
seems reasonable.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20230616/61b5aa1f/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list