[PATCH 1/8] ethosu: Add Arm Ethos-U driver

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 01:59:06PM +0800, Alison Wang wrote:
> Ethos-U Linux driver is to provide an example of how a rich operating
> system like Linux can dispatch inferences to an Arm Cortex-M subsystem,
> consisting of an Arm Cortex-M and an Arm Ethos-U NPU.
> 
> Link: https://git.mlplatform.org/ml/ethos-u/ethos-u-linux-driver-stack.git
> Tag: 22.02

What does "Tag:" mean?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Kristofer Jonsson <kristofer.jonsson at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Per Astrand <per.astrand at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonny Svärd <jonny.svaerd at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lior Dekel <Lior.dekel at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Henrik Hoglind <henrik.hoglind at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Davide Grohmann <davide.grohmann at arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang at nxp.com>

If this many people signed off on this, it better be correct :)

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ethosu/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +#
> +# (C) COPYRIGHT 2020 ARM Limited. All rights reserved.

It's not 2020 anymore.

> +#
> +# This program is free software and is provided to you under the terms of the
> +# GNU General Public License version 2 as published by the Free Software
> +# Foundation, and any use by you of this program is subject to the terms
> +# of such GNU licence.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program; if not, you can access it online at
> +# http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html.
> +#
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +#
> +
> +config ETHOSU
> +    tristate "Arm Ethos-U NPU support"
> +    help
> +      Arm Ethos-U NPU driver.

{sigh}

With all of those people, NO ONE ran checkpatch.pl on the thing?

I'm stopping here, please go do that, fix up the obvious issues it tells
you about (hint, no SPDX line and drop the huge license "boiler plate"
texts)

And also provide a REAL configuration help text, 4 words for this is
just not acceptable, what would you do if you were asked to review this?

thanks,

greg k-h