[PATCH net-next 5/8] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add MTK_NETSYS_V3 capability bit

[Lorenzo Bianconi]

> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 01:38:23AM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > @@ -1333,8 +1354,13 @@ static int mtk_tx_map(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> >  	mtk_tx_set_dma_desc(dev, itxd, &txd_info);
> >  
> >  	itx_buf->flags |= MTK_TX_FLAGS_SINGLE0;
> > -	itx_buf->flags |= (!mac->id) ? MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT0 :
> > -			  MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT1;
> > +	if (mac->id == MTK_GMAC1_ID)
> > +		itx_buf->flags |= MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT0;
> > +	else if (mac->id == MTK_GMAC2_ID)
> > +		itx_buf->flags |= MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT1;
> > +	else
> > +		itx_buf->flags |= MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT2;
> 
> There appears to be two places that this code structure appears, and
> this is in the path for packet transmission. I wonder if it would be
> more efficient to instead do:
> 
> 	itx_buf->flags |= MTK_TX_FLAGS_SINGLE0 | mac->tx_flags;
> 
> with mac->tx_flags appropriately initialised?
> 
> > @@ -2170,7 +2214,9 @@ static int mtk_poll_tx_qdma(struct mtk_eth *eth, int budget,
> >  		tx_buf = mtk_desc_to_tx_buf(ring, desc,
> >  					    eth->soc->txrx.txd_size);
> >  		if (tx_buf->flags & MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT1)
> > -			mac = 1;
> > +			mac = MTK_GMAC2_ID;
> > +		else if (tx_buf->flags & MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT2)
> > +			mac = MTK_GMAC3_ID;
> 
> This has me wondering whether the flags are used for hardware or just
> for the driver's purposes. If it's the latter, can we instead store the
> MAC index in tx_buf, rather than having to decode a bitfield?
> 
> I suspect these are just for the driver given that the addition of
> MTK_TX_FLAGS_FPORT2 changes all subsequent bit numbers in this struct
> member.

ack, I agree. I will rework it.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> >  
> >  		if (!tx_buf->data)
> >  			break;
> > @@ -3783,7 +3829,26 @@ static int mtk_hw_init(struct mtk_eth *eth, bool reset)
> >  	mtk_w32(eth, eth->soc->txrx.rx_irq_done_mask, reg_map->qdma.int_grp + 4);
> >  	mtk_w32(eth, 0x21021000, MTK_FE_INT_GRP);
> >  
> > -	if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_NETSYS_V2)) {
> > +	if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_NETSYS_V3)) {
> > +		/* PSE should not drop port1, port8 and port9 packets */
> > +		mtk_w32(eth, 0x00000302, PSE_DROP_CFG);
> > +
> > +		/* GDM and CDM Threshold */
> > +		mtk_w32(eth, 0x00000707, MTK_CDMW0_THRES);
> > +		mtk_w32(eth, 0x00000077, MTK_CDMW1_THRES);
> > +
> > +		/* Disable GDM1 RX CRC stripping */
> > +		val = mtk_r32(eth, MTK_GDMA_FWD_CFG(0));
> > +		val &= ~MTK_GDMA_STRP_CRC;
> > +		mtk_w32(eth, val, MTK_GDMA_FWD_CFG(0));
> 
> mtk_m32() ?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
> FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20230613/a92ee237/attachment.sig>