[PATCH v6 0/2] arm64: kdump: simplify the reservation behaviour of crashkernel=,high

Baoquan He bhe at redhat.com
Sun Jun 11 05:15:07 PDT 2023


Hi Catalin,

On 06/09/23 at 08:30pm, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, 15 May 2023 14:02:57 +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > In v5 patch, Catalin helped review and acked the patch. However, an
> > uninitialized local varilable is warned out by static checker when Will
> > tried to merge the patch. And Will complained the code flow in
> > reserve_crashkernel() is hard to follow, required to refactor. While
> > when I tried to do the refactory, I feel it's not easy, the existing
> > several cases causes that.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to arm64 (for-next/kdump).
> 
> I reworte some of the paragraphs in the documentation patch, removed
> some sentences to make it easier to read (some details were pretty
> obvious). Please have a look, if you think I missed something important,
> just send a patch on top. Thanks.
> 
> [1/2] arm64: kdump: simplify the reservation behaviour of crashkernel=,high
>       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/6c4dcaddbd36
> [2/2] Documentation: add kdump.rst to present crashkernel reservation on arm64
>       https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/03dc0e05407f

Could you help add below code change into the document patch commit? I
forgot adding it and got warning report from lkp test robot.

https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306110549.ynH2Juok-lkp@intel.com/


diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst
index ae21f8118830..dcfebddb6088 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/index.rst
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ ARM64 Architecture
     sve
     tagged-address-abi
     tagged-pointers
+    kdump
 
     features
 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list