[PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: PMU: Disallow vPMU on non-uniform PMUVer systems

[Reiji Watanabe]

Hi Oliver,

On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 07:32:42PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 11:15:20PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> > Disallow userspace from configuring vPMU for guests on systems
> > where the PMUVer is not uniform across all PEs.
> > KVM has not been advertising PMUv3 to the guests with vPMU on
> > such systems anyway, and such systems would be extremely
> > uncommon and unlikely to even use KVM.
> 
> Ok... Now your changes are starting to make sense. This patch is rather
> relevant context for interpreting the other PMU fix [*], so I'd
> recommend you send this as a combined series going forward.

Sure, I will include the patch [*] in this series.

> 
> [*]  https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/20230610194510.4146549-1-reijiw@google.com/
> 
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > index eef17de966da..af1fe2b53fbb 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > @@ -105,6 +105,14 @@ void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> >  
> >  u8 kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit(void);
> >  
> > +static inline void kvm_arm_set_support_pmu_v3(void)
> > +{
> > +	u8 pmuver = kvm_arm_pmu_get_pmuver_limit();
> > +
> > +	if (pmu_v3_is_supported(pmuver))
> > +		static_branch_enable(&kvm_arm_pmu_available);
> > +}
> > +
> >  #else
> >  struct kvm_pmu {
> >  };
> > @@ -114,6 +122,8 @@ static inline bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void)
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static inline void kvm_arm_set_support_pmu_v3(void) {};
> > +
> 
> nit: Give this thing a more generic name (e.g. kvm_pmu_init()) in case
> we wind up needing more boot-time PMU initialization.

Sure, thank you for the suggestion!

Thank you,
Reiji