[PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: timer: atmel,at91sam9260-pit: convert to yaml

[Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com]

On 09.06.2023 15:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> On 09/06/2023 14:09, Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> interrupts? They are still required, so why no description here?
>>>>
>>>> It was here in the previous versions but Conor suggested to remove it as it
>>>> was nothing specific about this description. For the if-then branch I kept
>>>> it to specify that the interrupt is share with other devices. In this
>>>> branch the interrupt is only for the timer itself. With this, would you
>>>> still prefer to add it back?
>>>
>>> I just don't understand why interrupts are in one arm of the if: and not
>>> in the other.
>>>
>>
>> As previously mentioned, Conor suggested to have it like this.
>>
> 
> ok

Would you still prefer to add back interrupt description on both branches
of if?

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>