[PATCH V9 3/4] clk: meson: S4: add support for Amlogic S4 SoC PLL clock driver
Yu Tu
yu.tu at amlogic.com
Thu Jun 8 02:30:52 PDT 2023
On 2023/6/8 16:53, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct clk_regmap s4_fclk_div4 = {
>>>> + .data = &(struct clk_regmap_gate_data){
>>>> + .offset = ANACTRL_FIXPLL_CTRL1,
>>>> + .bit_idx = 21,
>>>> + },
>>>> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
>>>> + .name = "fclk_div4",
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * For more information, please refer to s4_fixed_pll_dco.
>>>> + */
>>> While div2 and div3 got an explanation from previous SoCs, they others -
>>> like div4/div7/etc ... - have been able to cope with rw ops so far.
>>> Why is the S4 different for all these clocks ?
>>
>> The chip was changed fixed pll for security reasons.
>>
>> Fixed PLL registers are not writable in the kernel phase. Write of fixed
>> PLL-related register will cause the system to crash.
>>
>
> That is definitely worth mentionning
Can I understand that you agree with the use of "ro_ops" for FIXed PLL
related clocks later?
>
>>> Requiring RO ops (or fishy clock flags) is usually a sign that a clock
>>> is used without an appropriate driver.
>>>
>
> Neil is currently dealing with the dt-bindings, please
> * Adjust your patchset accordingly
> * Wait for his v2 to land, you'll need it.
OKay.
>
>>>> + .ops = &clk_regmap_gate_ro_ops,
>>>> + .parent_hws = (const struct clk_hw *[]) {
>>>> + &s4_fclk_div4_div.hw
>>>> + },
>>>> + .num_parents = 1,
>>>> + },
>>>> +};
>>>> +
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list