[PATCH 01/21] dt-bindings: microchip: atmel,at91rm9200-tcb: add sam9x60 compatible

[Nicolas Ferre]

On 05/06/2023 at 09:04, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 5, 2023, at 08:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/06/2023 22:02, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>>> Add sam9x60 compatible string support in the schema file
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran at microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml  | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml
>>> index a46411149571..c70c77a5e8e5 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/microchip/atmel,at91rm9200-tcb.yaml
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
>>>             - atmel,at91rm9200-tcb
>>>             - atmel,at91sam9x5-tcb
>>>             - atmel,sama5d2-tcb
>>> +          - microchip,sam9x60-tcb
>>
>> No wildcards.
> 
> sam9x60 is the actual name of the chip, it's no wildcard. For sam9x70,
> sam9x72 and sam9x75, I think using sam9x7 as the compatible string
> is probably fine, as long as they are actually the same chip. Again,
> the 'x' in there is not a wildcard but part of the name.

Yes, exactly Arnd, for those two SoC, 'x' is not a wildcard.

Best regards,
   Nicolas


-- 
Nicolas Ferre