[PATCH 3/4] perf/arm_cspmu: Clean up ACPI dependency

Ilkka Koskinen ilkka at os.amperecomputing.com
Mon Jun 5 00:33:19 PDT 2023



On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Build-wise, the ACPI dependency consists of only a couple of things
> which could probably stand being factored out into ACPI helpers anyway.
> However for the immediate concern of working towards Devicetree support
> here, it's easy enough to make a few tweaks to contain the affected code
> locally, such that we can relax the Kconfig dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy at arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Ilkka Koskinen <ilkka at os.amperecomputing.com>

> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig     |  3 +--
> drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> index 0b316fe69a45..25d25ded0983 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Kconfig
> @@ -4,8 +4,7 @@
>
> config ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU
> 	tristate "ARM Coresight Architecture PMU"
> -	depends on ARM64 && ACPI
> -	depends on ACPI_APMT || COMPILE_TEST
> +	depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> 	help
> 	  Provides support for performance monitoring unit (PMU) devices
> 	  based on ARM CoreSight PMU architecture. Note that this PMU
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> index 72dc7a9e1ca8..3b91115c376d 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <acpi/processor.h>
>
> #include "arm_cspmu.h"
> #include "nvidia_cspmu.h"
> @@ -1075,6 +1074,9 @@ static int arm_cspmu_request_irq(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> 	return 0;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> +#include <acpi/processor.h>
> +
> static inline int arm_cspmu_find_cpu_container(int cpu, u32 container_uid)
> {
> 	u32 acpi_uid;
> @@ -1099,7 +1101,7 @@ static inline int arm_cspmu_find_cpu_container(int cpu, u32 container_uid)
> 	return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> -static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +static int arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> {
> 	struct device *dev;
> 	struct acpi_apmt_node *apmt_node;
> @@ -1135,6 +1137,17 @@ static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
>
> 	return 0;
> }
> +#else
> +static int arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +{
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static int arm_cspmu_get_cpus(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> +{
> +	return arm_cspmu_acpi_get_cpus(cspmu);
> +}
>
> static int arm_cspmu_register_pmu(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
> {
> -- 
> 2.39.2.101.g768bb238c484.dirty
>
>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list