[PATCH net-next 08/30] net: dsa: mt7530: change p{5,6}_interface to p{5,6}_configured

[Vladimir Oltean]

On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 04:14:31PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> On 4.06.2023 16:07, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 03:55:17PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 01:18:04PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > > > I don't remember whether Vladimir's firmware validator will fail for
> > > > mt753x if CPU ports are not fully described, but that would be well
> > > > worth checking. If it does, then we can be confident that phylink
> > > > will always be used, and those bypassing calls should not be necessary.
> > > 
> > > It does, I've just retested this:
> > > 
> > > [    8.469152] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: OF node /soc/pcie at 1f0000000/ethernet-switch at 0,5/ports/port at 4 of CPU port 4 lacks the required "phy-handle", "fixed-link" or "managed" properties
> > > [    8.494571] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: error -EINVAL: Failed to register DSA switch
> > > [    8.502151] mscc_felix: probe of 0000:00:00.5 failed with error -22
> > 
> > ... which isn't listed in dsa_switches_apply_workarounds[], and
> > neither is mt753x. Thanks.
> > 
> > So, that should be sufficient to know that the CPU port will always
> > properly described, and thus bypassing phylink in mt753x for the CPU
> > port should not be necessary.
> 
> Perfect! If I understand correctly, there's this code - specific to MT7531
> and MT7988 ports being used as CPU ports - which runs in addition to what's
> in mt753x_phylink_mac_config():
> 
> 	mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PMCR_P(port),
> 		     PMCR_CPU_PORT_SETTING(priv->id));
> 
> This should be put on mt753x_phylink_mac_config(), under priv->id ==
> ID_MT7531, priv->id == ID_MT7988, and dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port) checks?
> 
> Arınç

Given that mt753x_phylink_mac_config() and mt753x_phylink_mac_link_up() also
both modifies MT7530_PMCR_P(port), have you studied the code to see what
really is changed compared to what's in the PMCR_CPU_PORT_SETTING() macro,
after both phylink methods have run?