[PATCH] arm64: Fix HFGxTR_EL2 field naming

Marc Zyngier maz at kernel.org
Mon Jul 3 06:30:50 PDT 2023


On Mon, 03 Jul 2023 14:13:45 +0100,
Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 02:04:16PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> > It is a bit sad that they were written by hand despite the availability
> > of a machine readable version...
> 
> Indeed :/

Any hope of a change on that front? It is hard to have the utmost
confidence in these dumps when they are handwritten. At the very
least, they should undergo an automated test against the XML.

> 
> > +Field	46	ERXPFGF_EL1
> 
> This one isn't symmetric between R and W, it's RES0 in W.

There is plenty more (bits 46, 42, 40, 28, 26, 25, 21, 18, 15, 14, 10,
9, 2) in 0487J.a.

	M.


-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list