[PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement
Dan Carpenter
error27 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 07:07:07 PST 2023
The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended. Also it's
cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index d21c7eafd641..703f16ef3953 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (ret)
goto clear_dev_req_notifier;
- /* Bail out anyway when coex enabled */
- return ret;
+ /* Bail out anyway when coex disabled. */
+ return 0;
}
/* Coex enabled, carry on in any case. */
--
2.35.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list