[PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Clean up a return statement

Dan Carpenter error27 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 07:07:07 PST 2023


The comments say "enabled" where "disabled" is intended.  Also it's
cleaner to return zero explicitly instead of ret.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27 at gmail.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index d21c7eafd641..703f16ef3953 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -2739,8 +2739,8 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				if (ret)
 					goto clear_dev_req_notifier;
 
-				/* Bail out anyway when coex enabled */
-				return ret;
+				/* Bail out anyway when coex disabled. */
+				return 0;
 			}
 
 			/* Coex enabled, carry on in any case. */
-- 
2.35.1




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list