[PATCH v8 00/17] Introduce a unified API for SCMI Server testing
Sudeep Holla
sudeep.holla at arm.com
Fri Jan 20 03:38:02 PST 2023
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:56:32AM +0000, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 09:11:24AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent,
>
> thanks for trying this out.
>
> > I haven't seen a description of the <M>. I figured out that this is
> > the protocol id to which the channel was associated in DT while
> > testing it but it could be good to describe this somewhere.
>
> Ah, damn yes, I had made a note to myself to add an explicit description
> of how the channel number IDs are chosen, then I forgot :P
>
> I'll add a follow-on patch once is queued.
>
Please post it ASAP so that I can include it before I tag, just trying
to avoid missing it now and sending it as fix later :).
> > Apart from this minor thing, I have tested it with an scmi server
> > embedded in OPTEE and run the scmi compliance tests. Everything works
> > fine using the default mode or using one specific channel.
> >
> > FWIW
> > Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot at linaro.org>
Thanks Vincent and Florian. I just pulled and merged this last night, will
update to include your Tested-by tags.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list