[PATCH v2 7/8] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU register test for implemented counters
Shaoqin Huang
shahuang at redhat.com
Tue Jan 17 23:47:41 PST 2023
Hi Reiji,
I found some place should be PMEVTYPER, but wrongly written to
PMEVTTYPE. Should we fix them?
I list some of them, but not covered every one.
On 1/17/23 09:35, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> Add a new test case to the vpmu_counter_access test to check if PMU
> registers or their bits for implemented counters on the vCPU are
> readable/writable as expected, and can be programmed to count events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com>
> ---
> .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 347 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 344 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> index 704a2500b7e1..54b69c76c824 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c
> @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
> * Copyright (c) 2022 Google LLC.
> *
> * This test checks if the guest can see the same number of the PMU event
> - * counters (PMCR_EL1.N) that userspace sets.
> + * counters (PMCR_EL1.N) that userspace sets, and if the guest can access
> + * those counters.
> * This test runs only when KVM_CAP_ARM_PMU_V3 is supported on the host.
> */
> #include <kvm_util.h>
> @@ -18,19 +19,350 @@
> /* The max number of the PMU event counters (excluding the cycle counter) */
> #define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS (ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
>
> +/*
> + * The macros and functions below for reading/writing PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
Here should be PMEV{CNTR, TYPER}.
> + * were basically copied from arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c.
> + */
> +#define PMEVN_CASE(n, case_macro) \
> + case n: case_macro(n); break
> +
> +#define PMEVN_SWITCH(x, case_macro) \
> + do { \
> + switch (x) { \
> + PMEVN_CASE(0, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(1, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(2, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(3, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(4, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(5, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(6, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(7, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(8, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(9, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(10, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(11, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(12, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(13, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(14, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(15, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(16, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(17, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(18, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(19, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(20, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(21, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(22, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(23, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(24, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(25, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(26, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(27, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(28, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(29, case_macro); \
> + PMEVN_CASE(30, case_macro); \
> + default: \
> + GUEST_ASSERT_1(0, x); \
> + } \
> + } while (0)
> +
> +#define RETURN_READ_PMEVCNTRN(n) \
> + return read_sysreg(pmevcntr##n##_el0)
> +static unsigned long read_pmevcntrn(int n)
> +{
> + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, RETURN_READ_PMEVCNTRN);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define WRITE_PMEVCNTRN(n) \
> + write_sysreg(val, pmevcntr##n##_el0)
> +static void write_pmevcntrn(int n, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, WRITE_PMEVCNTRN);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +#define READ_PMEVTYPERN(n) \
> + return read_sysreg(pmevtyper##n##_el0)
> +static unsigned long read_pmevtypern(int n)
> +{
> + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, READ_PMEVTYPERN);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#define WRITE_PMEVTYPERN(n) \
> + write_sysreg(val, pmevtyper##n##_el0)
> +static void write_pmevtypern(int n, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + PMEVN_SWITCH(n, WRITE_PMEVTYPERN);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +/* Read PMEVTCNTR<n>_EL0 through PMXEVCNTR_EL0 */
> +static inline unsigned long read_sel_evcntr(int sel)
> +{
> + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0);
> + isb();
> + return read_sysreg(pmxevcntr_el0);
> +}
> +
> +/* Write PMEVTCNTR<n>_EL0 through PMXEVCNTR_EL0 */
> +static inline void write_sel_evcntr(int sel, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0);
> + isb();
> + write_sysreg(val, pmxevcntr_el0);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +/* Read PMEVTTYPER<n>_EL0 through PMXEVTYPER_EL0 */
Here should be PMEVTYPER.
> +static inline unsigned long read_sel_evtyper(int sel)
> +{
> + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0);
> + isb();
> + return read_sysreg(pmxevtyper_el0);
> +}
> +
> +/* Write PMEVTTYPER<n>_EL0 through PMXEVTYPER_EL0 */
> +static inline void write_sel_evtyper(int sel, unsigned long val)
> +{
> + write_sysreg(sel, pmselr_el0);
> + isb();
> + write_sysreg(val, pmxevtyper_el0);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void enable_counter(int idx)
> +{
> + uint64_t v = read_sysreg(pmcntenset_el0);
> +
> + write_sysreg(BIT(idx) | v, pmcntenset_el0);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void disable_counter(int idx)
> +{
> + uint64_t v = read_sysreg(pmcntenset_el0);
> +
> + write_sysreg(BIT(idx) | v, pmcntenclr_el0);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * The pmc_accessor structure has pointers to PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
> + * accessors that test cases will use. Each of the accessors will
> + * either directly reads/writes PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0
> + * (i.e. {read,write}_pmev{cnt,type}rn()), or reads/writes them through
> + * PMXEV{CNTR,TYPER}_EL0 (i.e. {read,write}_sel_ev{cnt,type}r()).
> + *
> + * This is used to test that combinations of those accessors provide
> + * the consistent behavior.
> + */
> +struct pmc_accessor {
> + /* A function to be used to read PMEVTCNTR<n>_EL0 */
> + unsigned long (*read_cntr)(int idx);
> + /* A function to be used to write PMEVTCNTR<n>_EL0 */
> + void (*write_cntr)(int idx, unsigned long val);
> + /* A function to be used to read PMEVTTYPER<n>_EL0 */
> + unsigned long (*read_typer)(int idx);
> + /* A function to be used write PMEVTTYPER<n>_EL0 */
> + void (*write_typer)(int idx, unsigned long val);
> +};
> +
> +struct pmc_accessor pmc_accessors[] = {
> + /* test with all direct accesses */
> + { read_pmevcntrn, write_pmevcntrn, read_pmevtypern, write_pmevtypern },
> + /* test with all indirect accesses */
> + { read_sel_evcntr, write_sel_evcntr, read_sel_evtyper, write_sel_evtyper },
> + /* read with direct accesses, and write with indirect accesses */
> + { read_pmevcntrn, write_sel_evcntr, read_pmevtypern, write_sel_evtyper },
> + /* read with indirect accesses, and write with direct accesses */
> + { read_sel_evcntr, write_pmevcntrn, read_sel_evtyper, write_pmevtypern },
> +};
> +
> +static void pmu_disable_reset(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0);
> +
> + /* Reset all counters, disabling them */
> + pmcr &= ~ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E;
> + write_sysreg(pmcr | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P, pmcr_el0);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static void pmu_enable(void)
> +{
> + uint64_t pmcr = read_sysreg(pmcr_el0);
> +
> + /* Reset all counters, disabling them */
> + pmcr |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E;
> + write_sysreg(pmcr | ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_P, pmcr_el0);
> + isb();
> +}
> +
> +static bool pmu_event_is_supported(uint64_t event)
> +{
> + GUEST_ASSERT_1(event < 64, event);
> + return (read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0) & BIT(event));
> +}
> +
> static uint64_t pmcr_extract_n(uint64_t pmcr_val)
> {
> return (pmcr_val >> ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_N_MASK;
> }
>
> +#define GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(regname, mask, set_expected) \
> +{ \
> + uint64_t _tval = read_sysreg(regname); \
> + \
> + if (set_expected) \
> + GUEST_ASSERT_3((_tval & mask), _tval, mask, set_expected); \
> + else \
> + GUEST_ASSERT_3(!(_tval & mask), _tval, mask, set_expected);\
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if @mask bits in {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR} registers
> + * are set or cleared as specified in @set_expected.
> + */
> +static void check_bitmap_pmu_regs(uint64_t mask, bool set_expected)
> +{
> + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmcntenset_el0, mask, set_expected);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmcntenclr_el0, mask, set_expected);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmovsset_el0, mask, set_expected);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_BITMAP_REG(pmovsclr_el0, mask, set_expected);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if the bit in {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR} registers corresponding
> + * to the specified counter (@pmc_idx) can be read/written as expected.
> + * When @set_op is true, it tries to set the bit for the counter in
> + * those registers by writing the SET registers (the bit won't be set
> + * if the counter is not implemented though).
> + * Otherwise, it tries to clear the bits in the registers by writing
> + * the CLR registers.
> + * Then, it checks if the values indicated in the registers are as expected.
> + */
> +static void test_bitmap_pmu_regs(int pmc_idx, bool set_op)
> +{
> + uint64_t pmcr_n, test_bit = BIT(pmc_idx);
> + bool set_expected = false;
> +
> + if (set_op) {
> + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmcntenset_el0);
> + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmovsset_el0);
> +
> + /* The bit will be set only if the counter is implemented */
> + pmcr_n = pmcr_extract_n(read_sysreg(pmcr_el0));
> + set_expected = (pmc_idx < pmcr_n) ? true : false;
> + } else {
> + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmcntenclr_el0);
> + write_sysreg(test_bit, pmovsclr_el0);
> + }
> + check_bitmap_pmu_regs(test_bit, set_expected);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Tests for reading/writing registers for the (implemented) event counter
> + * specified by @pmc_idx.
> + */
> +static void test_access_pmc_regs(struct pmc_accessor *acc, int pmc_idx)
> +{
> + uint64_t write_data, read_data, read_data_prev, test_bit;
> +
> + /* Disable all PMCs and reset all PMCs to zero. */
> + pmu_disable_reset();
> +
> +
> + /*
> + * Tests for reading/writing {PMCNTEN,PMOVS}{SET,CLR}_EL1.
> + */
> +
> + test_bit = 1ul << pmc_idx;
> + /* Make sure that the bit in those registers are set to 0 */
> + test_bitmap_pmu_regs(test_bit, false);
> + /* Test if setting the bit in those registers works */
> + test_bitmap_pmu_regs(test_bit, true);
> + /* Test if clearing the bit in those registers works */
> + test_bitmap_pmu_regs(test_bit, false);
> +
> +
> + /*
> + * Tests for reading/writing the event type register.
> + */
> +
> + read_data = acc->read_typer(pmc_idx);
> + /*
> + * Set the event type register to an arbitrary value just for testing
> + * of reading/writing the register.
> + * ArmARM says that for the event from 0x0000 to 0x003F,
> + * the value indicated in the PMEVTYPER<n>_EL0.evtCount field is
> + * the value written to the field even when the specified event
> + * is not supported.
> + */
> + write_data = (ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1 | ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED);
> + acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, write_data);
> + read_data = acc->read_typer(pmc_idx);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data == write_data,
> + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, write_data);
> +
> +
> + /*
> + * Tests for reading/writing the event count register.
> + */
> +
> + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx);
> +
> + /* The count value must be 0, as it is not used after the reset */
> + GUEST_ASSERT_3(read_data == 0, pmc_idx, acc, read_data);
> +
> + write_data = read_data + pmc_idx + 0x12345;
> + acc->write_cntr(pmc_idx, write_data);
> + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data == write_data,
> + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, write_data);
> +
> +
> + /* The following test requires the INST_RETIRED event support. */
> + if (!pmu_event_is_supported(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED))
> + return;
> +
> + pmu_enable();
> + acc->write_typer(pmc_idx, ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_INST_RETIRED);
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure that the counter doesn't count the INST_RETIRED
> + * event when disabled, and the counter counts the event when enabled.
> + */
> + disable_counter(pmc_idx);
> + read_data_prev = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx);
> + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data == read_data_prev,
> + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, read_data_prev);
> +
> + enable_counter(pmc_idx);
> + read_data = acc->read_cntr(pmc_idx);
> +
> + /*
> + * The counter should be increased by at least 1, as there is at
> + * least one instruction between enabling the counter and reading
> + * the counter (the test assumes that all event counters are not
> + * being used by the host's higher priority events).
> + */
> + GUEST_ASSERT_4(read_data > read_data_prev,
> + pmc_idx, acc, read_data, read_data_prev);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * The guest is configured with PMUv3 with @expected_pmcr_n number of
> * event counters.
> - * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N.
> + * Check if @expected_pmcr_n is consistent with PMCR_EL0.N, and
> + * if reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters can work
> + * as expected.
> */
> static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
> {
> uint64_t pmcr, pmcr_n;
> + int i, pmc;
>
> GUEST_ASSERT(expected_pmcr_n <= ARMV8_PMU_MAX_GENERAL_COUNTERS);
>
> @@ -40,6 +372,15 @@ static void guest_code(uint64_t expected_pmcr_n)
> /* Make sure that PMCR_EL0.N indicates the value userspace set */
> GUEST_ASSERT_2(pmcr_n == expected_pmcr_n, pmcr_n, expected_pmcr_n);
>
> + /*
> + * Tests for reading/writing PMU registers for implemented counters.
> + * Use each combination of PMEVT{CNTR,TYPER}<n>_EL0 accessor functions.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmc_accessors); i++) {
> + for (pmc = 0; pmc < pmcr_n; pmc++)
> + test_access_pmc_regs(&pmc_accessors[i], pmc);
> + }
> +
> GUEST_DONE();
> }
>
> @@ -96,7 +437,7 @@ static void run_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t pmcr_n)
> vcpu_run(vcpu);
> switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
> case UCALL_ABORT:
> - REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_2(uc, "values:%#lx %#lx");
> + REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_4(uc, "values:%#lx %#lx %#lx %#lx");
> break;
> case UCALL_DONE:
> break;
--
Regards,
Shaoqin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list