[PATCH net-next 2/5] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: add pps support
Roger Quadros
rogerq at kernel.org
Fri Jan 13 01:57:00 PST 2023
Hi,
On 11/01/2023 13:44, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com>
>
> CPTS doesn't have HW support for PPS ("pulse per second”) signal
> generation, but it can be modeled by using Time Sync Router and routing
> GenFx (periodic signal generator) output to CPTS_HWy_TS_PUSH (hardware time
> stamp) input, and configuring GenFx to generate 1sec pulses.
>
> +------------------------+
> | CPTS |
> | |
> +--->CPTS_HW4_PUSH GENFx+---+
> | | | |
> | +------------------------+ |
> | |
> +--------------------------------+
>
> Add corresponding support to am65-cpts driver. The DT property "ti,pps"
> has to be used to enable PPS support and configure pair
> [CPTS_HWy_TS_PUSH, GenFx].
>
> Once enabled, PPS can be tested using ppstest tool:
> # ./ppstest /dev/pps0
>
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli at ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c
> index 9535396b28cd..6a0f09b497d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpts.c
> @@ -176,6 +176,10 @@ struct am65_cpts {
> u32 genf_enable;
> u32 hw_ts_enable;
> struct sk_buff_head txq;
> + bool pps_enabled;
> + bool pps_present;
> + u32 pps_hw_ts_idx;
> + u32 pps_genf_idx;
> /* context save/restore */
> u64 sr_cpts_ns;
> u64 sr_ktime_ns;
> @@ -319,8 +323,15 @@ static int am65_cpts_fifo_read(struct am65_cpts *cpts)
> case AM65_CPTS_EV_HW:
> pevent.index = am65_cpts_event_get_port(event) - 1;
> pevent.timestamp = event->timestamp;
> - pevent.type = PTP_CLOCK_EXTTS;
> - dev_dbg(cpts->dev, "AM65_CPTS_EV_HW p:%d t:%llu\n",
> + if (cpts->pps_enabled && pevent.index == cpts->pps_hw_ts_idx) {
> + pevent.type = PTP_CLOCK_PPSUSR;
> + pevent.pps_times.ts_real = ns_to_timespec64(pevent.timestamp);
> + } else {
> + pevent.type = PTP_CLOCK_EXTTS;
> + }
> + dev_dbg(cpts->dev, "AM65_CPTS_EV_HW:%s p:%d t:%llu\n",
> + pevent.type == PTP_CLOCK_EXTTS ?
> + "extts" : "pps",
> pevent.index, event->timestamp);
>
> ptp_clock_event(cpts->ptp_clock, &pevent);
> @@ -507,7 +518,13 @@ static void am65_cpts_extts_enable_hw(struct am65_cpts *cpts, u32 index, int on)
>
> static int am65_cpts_extts_enable(struct am65_cpts *cpts, u32 index, int on)
> {
> - if (!!(cpts->hw_ts_enable & BIT(index)) == !!on)
> + if (index >= cpts->ptp_info.n_ext_ts)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + if (cpts->pps_present && index == cpts->pps_hw_ts_idx)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (((cpts->hw_ts_enable & BIT(index)) >> index) == on)
> return 0;
>
> mutex_lock(&cpts->ptp_clk_lock);
> @@ -591,6 +608,12 @@ static void am65_cpts_perout_enable_hw(struct am65_cpts *cpts,
> static int am65_cpts_perout_enable(struct am65_cpts *cpts,
> struct ptp_perout_request *req, int on)
> {
> + if (req->index >= cpts->ptp_info.n_per_out)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + if (cpts->pps_present && req->index == cpts->pps_genf_idx)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (!!(cpts->genf_enable & BIT(req->index)) == !!on)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -604,6 +627,48 @@ static int am65_cpts_perout_enable(struct am65_cpts *cpts,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int am65_cpts_pps_enable(struct am65_cpts *cpts, int on)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct timespec64 ts;
> + struct ptp_clock_request rq;
> + u64 ns;
> +
> + if (!cpts->pps_present)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (cpts->pps_enabled == !!on)
> + return 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&cpts->ptp_clk_lock);
> +
> + if (on) {
> + am65_cpts_extts_enable_hw(cpts, cpts->pps_hw_ts_idx, on);
> +
> + ns = am65_cpts_gettime(cpts, NULL);
> + ts = ns_to_timespec64(ns);
> + rq.perout.period.sec = 1;
> + rq.perout.period.nsec = 0;
> + rq.perout.start.sec = ts.tv_sec + 2;
> + rq.perout.start.nsec = 0;
> + rq.perout.index = cpts->pps_genf_idx;
> +
> + am65_cpts_perout_enable_hw(cpts, &rq.perout, on);
> + cpts->pps_enabled = true;
> + } else {
> + rq.perout.index = cpts->pps_genf_idx;
> + am65_cpts_perout_enable_hw(cpts, &rq.perout, on);
> + am65_cpts_extts_enable_hw(cpts, cpts->pps_hw_ts_idx, on);
> + cpts->pps_enabled = false;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&cpts->ptp_clk_lock);
> +
> + dev_dbg(cpts->dev, "%s: pps: %s\n",
> + __func__, on ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int am65_cpts_ptp_enable(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
> struct ptp_clock_request *rq, int on)
> {
> @@ -614,6 +679,8 @@ static int am65_cpts_ptp_enable(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
> return am65_cpts_extts_enable(cpts, rq->extts.index, on);
> case PTP_CLK_REQ_PEROUT:
> return am65_cpts_perout_enable(cpts, &rq->perout, on);
> + case PTP_CLK_REQ_PPS:
> + return am65_cpts_pps_enable(cpts, on);
> default:
> break;
> }
> @@ -926,6 +993,12 @@ static int am65_cpts_of_parse(struct am65_cpts *cpts, struct device_node *node)
> if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "ti,cpts-periodic-outputs", &prop[0]))
> cpts->genf_num = prop[0];
>
> + if (!of_property_read_u32_array(node, "ti,pps", prop, 2)) {
> + cpts->pps_present = true;
> + cpts->pps_hw_ts_idx = prop[0];
> + cpts->pps_genf_idx = prop[1];
What happens if DT provides an invalid value. e.g. out of range?
Better to do a sanity check?
> + }
> +
> return cpts_of_mux_clk_setup(cpts, node);
> }
>
> @@ -993,6 +1066,8 @@ struct am65_cpts *am65_cpts_create(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs,
> cpts->ptp_info.n_ext_ts = cpts->ext_ts_inputs;
> if (cpts->genf_num)
> cpts->ptp_info.n_per_out = cpts->genf_num;
> + if (cpts->pps_present)
> + cpts->ptp_info.pps = 1;
>
> am65_cpts_set_add_val(cpts);
>
> @@ -1028,9 +1103,9 @@ struct am65_cpts *am65_cpts_create(struct device *dev, void __iomem *regs,
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> }
>
> - dev_info(dev, "CPTS ver 0x%08x, freq:%u, add_val:%u\n",
> + dev_info(dev, "CPTS ver 0x%08x, freq:%u, add_val:%u pps:%d\n",
> am65_cpts_read32(cpts, idver),
> - cpts->refclk_freq, cpts->ts_add_val);
> + cpts->refclk_freq, cpts->ts_add_val, cpts->pps_present);
>
> return cpts;
>
cheers,
-roger
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list