[PATCH net-next 0/5] Add PPS support to am65-cpts driver

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

Hello Roger,

On 13/01/23 15:18, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Siddharth,
> 
> On 11/01/2023 13:44, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> The CPTS hardware doesn't support PPS signal generation. Using the GenFx
>> (periodic signal generator) function, it is possible to model a PPS signal
>> followed by routing it via the time sync router to the CPTS_HWy_TS_PUSH
>> (hardware time stamp) input, in order to generate timestamps at 1 second
>> intervals.
>>
>> This series adds driver support for enabling PPS signal generation.
>> Additionally, the documentation for the am65-cpts driver is updated with
>> the bindings for the "ti,pps" property, which is used to inform the
>> pair [CPTS_HWy_TS_PUSH, GenFx] to the cpts driver. The PPS example is
>> enabled for AM625-SK board by default, by adding the timesync_router node
>> to the AM62x SoC, and configuring it for PPS in the AM625-SK board dts.
>>
>> Grygorii Strashko (3):
>>   dt-binding: net: ti: am65x-cpts: add 'ti,pps' property
>>   net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: add pps support
>>   net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpts: adjust pps following ptp changes
>>
>> Siddharth Vadapalli (2):
>>   arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Add timesync router node
>>   arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add cpsw3g cpts PPS support
> 
> Device tree patches need to be sent separately. You don't need to involve
> net maintainers for that.
> 
> If you introduce a new binding then that needs to be in maintainer's
> tree before you can send a related device tree patch.

Thank you for letting me know. Would I need to resend the series in order for it
to be reviewed? I was hoping that if I get feedback for this series, I will
implement it and post just the bindings and driver patches as the v2 series,
dropping the device tree patches. Please let me know.

Regards,
Siddharth.