[PATCH v2] filelock: move file locking definitions to separate header file
Xiubo Li
xiubli at redhat.com
Tue Jan 10 20:53:49 PST 2023
On 06/01/2023 05:19, Jeff Layton wrote:
> The file locking definitions have lived in fs.h since the dawn of time,
> but they are only used by a small subset of the source files that
> include it.
>
> Move the file locking definitions to a new header file, and add the
> appropriate #include directives to the source files that need them. By
> doing this we trim down fs.h a bit and limit the amount of rebuilding
> that has to be done when we make changes to the file locking APIs.
>
> Reviewed-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli at redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner at kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells at redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever at oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi at linux.alibaba.com>
> Acked-by: Steve French <stfrench at microsoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton at kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/sys_oabi-compat.c | 1 +
> fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 1 +
> fs/afs/internal.h | 1 +
> fs/attr.c | 1 +
> fs/ceph/locks.c | 1 +
ceph part looks good to me.
Thanks
- Xiubo
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list