[PATCH v2 09/23] clk: mediatek: mt8173: Remove mtk_clk_enable_critical()

[AngeloGioacchino Del Regno]

Il 30/12/22 05:58, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 5:43 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com> wrote:
>>
>> The entire point of mtk_clk_enable_critical() is to raise the refcount
>> of some clocks so that they won't be turned off during runtime, but
>> this is the same as what the CLK_IS_CRITICAL flag does.
>>
>> Set CLK_IS_CRITICAL on all of the critical clocks and remove the
>> aforementioned function as a cleanup.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> 
> 
> Looks good to me,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst at chromium.org>
> 
> However, if you move this patch before the previous one ...
> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c | 41 ++++++++++++-------------------
>>   1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c
>> index 70cdc0719658..02231f8ba6d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8173.c

>> @@ -846,23 +852,8 @@ static const struct mtk_clk_rst_desc clk_rst_desc[] = {
>>          }
>>   };
>>
>> -static struct clk_hw_onecell_data *mt8173_top_clk_data;
>> -static struct clk_hw_onecell_data *mt8173_pll_clk_data;
> 
> You wouldn't have to touch these lines twice?
> 

That's true, but please,  I prefer not to, as the patches are ordered for
eas(y/ier) bisectability in case anything happens.

Cheers,
Angelo