[PATCH v8 11/28] gunyah: rsc_mgr: Add VM lifecycle RPC
Srivatsa Vaddagiri
quic_svaddagi at quicinc.com
Sun Jan 8 23:13:09 PST 2023
* Elliot Berman <quic_eberman at quicinc.com> [2022-12-19 14:58:32]:
> +/* Call: CONSOLE_OPEN, CONSOLE_CLOSE, CONSOLE_FLUSH */
I think this struct is used by other calls as well?
Also CONSOLE_** functions are not yet introduced in this patch
> +struct gh_vm_common_vmid_req {
> + __le16 vmid;
> + __le16 reserved0;
> +} __packed;
[snip]
> +int gh_rm_alloc_vmid(struct gh_rm_rpc *rm, u16 vmid)
> +{
> + void *resp;
> + struct gh_vm_common_vmid_req req_payload = {
> + .vmid = cpu_to_le16(vmid),
> + };
> + struct gh_vm_common_vmid_req *resp_payload;
> + size_t resp_size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (vmid == GH_VMID_INVAL)
> + vmid = 0;
> +
> + ret = gh_rm_call(rm, GH_RM_RPC_VM_ALLOC_VMID, &req_payload, sizeof(req_payload), &resp,
> + &resp_size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (!vmid) {
> + if (resp_size != sizeof(*resp_payload)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + } else {
> + resp_payload = resp;
> + ret = resp_payload->vmid;
Do we need a le_to_cpu() wrapper on the response here?
> +int gh_rm_vm_stop(struct gh_rm_rpc *rm, u16 vmid)
> +{
> + struct gh_vm_stop_req req_payload = {
> + .vmid = cpu_to_le16(vmid),
> + };
> + void *resp;
> + size_t resp_size;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = gh_rm_call(rm, GH_RM_RPC_VM_STOP, &req_payload, sizeof(req_payload),
> + &resp, &resp_size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + kfree(resp);
Why not use gh_rm_common_vmid_call() here as well?
return gh_rm_common_vmid_call(rm, GH_RM_RPC_VM_STOP, vmid);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_rm_vm_stop);
> +
[snip]
> +ssize_t gh_rm_get_hyp_resources(struct gh_rm_rpc *rm, u16 vmid,
> + struct gh_rm_hyp_resource **resources)
> +{
> + struct gh_vm_get_hyp_resources_resp *resp;
> + size_t resp_size;
> + int ret;
> + struct gh_vm_common_vmid_req req_payload = {
> + .vmid = cpu_to_le16(vmid),
> + };
> +
> + ret = gh_rm_call(rm, GH_RM_RPC_VM_GET_HYP_RESOURCES,
> + &req_payload, sizeof(req_payload),
> + (void **)&resp, &resp_size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (resp_size < sizeof(*resp) ||
> + (sizeof(*resp->entries) && (resp->n_entries > U32_MAX / sizeof(*resp->entries))) ||
> + (resp_size != sizeof(*resp) + (resp->n_entries * sizeof(*resp->entries)))) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + *resources = kmemdup(resp->entries, (resp->n_entries * sizeof(*resp->entries)), GFP_KERNEL);
Consider NULL return value from kmemdup
> + ret = resp->n_entries;
> +
> +out:
> + kfree(resp);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gh_rm_get_hyp_resources);
> +
> +/**
> + * gh_rm_get_vmid() - Retrieve VMID of this virtual machine
> + * @vmid: Filled with the VMID of this VM
> + */
> +int gh_rm_get_vmid(struct gh_rm_rpc *rm, u16 *vmid)
> +{
> + static u16 cached_vmid = GH_VMID_INVAL;
> + void *resp;
> + size_t resp_size;
> + int ret;
> + int payload = 0;
> +
> + if (cached_vmid != GH_VMID_INVAL) {
> + *vmid = cached_vmid;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = gh_rm_call(rm, GH_RM_RPC_VM_GET_VMID, &payload, sizeof(payload), &resp, &resp_size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (resp_size != sizeof(*vmid))
kfree(resp) in this case?
> + return -EIO;
> + *vmid = *(u16 *)resp;
Do we need a le_to_cpu() wrapper on the response?
Also update cached_vmid in success case.
> + kfree(resp);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list