[PATCH v4 3/3] nvmem: stm32: detect bsec pta presence for STM32MP15x

Patrick DELAUNAY patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com
Wed Jan 4 05:02:21 PST 2023


Hi,

On 1/4/23 10:30, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 15:08, Patrick Delaunay
> <patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com> wrote:
>> On STM32MP15x SoC, the SMC backend is optional when OP-TEE is used;
>> the PTA BSEC should be used as it is done on STM32MP13x platform,
>> but the BSEC SMC can be also used: it is a legacy mode in OP-TEE,
>> not recommended but used in previous OP-TEE firmware.
>>
>> The presence of OP-TEE is dynamically detected in STM32MP15x device tree
>> and the supported NVMEM backend is dynamically detected:
>> - PTA with stm32_bsec_pta_find
>> - SMC with stm32_bsec_check
>>
>> With OP-TEE but without PTA and SMC detection, the probe is deferred for
>> STM32MP15x devices.
>>
>> On STM32MP13x platform, only the PTA is supported with cfg->ta = true
>> and this detection is skipped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay at foss.st.com>
>> ---
>>
>> (no changes since v3)
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - use of_find_compatible_node in optee_presence_check function
>>    instead of of_find_node_by_path("/firmware/optee")
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Added patch in the serie for BSEC PTA support on STM32MP15x
>>    with dynamic detection of OP-TEE presence and SMC support (legacy mode)
>>
>>   drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c b/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c
>> index 2edc61925e52..1b90c78301fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c
>> @@ -159,6 +159,31 @@ static int stm32_bsec_pta_write(void *context, unsigned int offset, void *buf,
>>          return stm32_bsec_optee_ta_write(priv->ctx, priv->lower, offset, buf, bytes);
>>   }
>>
>> +static bool stm32_bsec_smc_check(void)
>> +{
>> +       u32 val;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       /* check that the OP-TEE support the BSEC SMC (legacy mode) */
>> +       ret = stm32_bsec_smc(STM32_SMC_READ_SHADOW, 0, 0, &val);
>> +
>> +       return !ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool optee_presence_check(void)
>> +{
>> +       struct device_node *np;
>> +       bool tee_detected = false;
>> +
>> +       /* check that the OP-TEE node is present and available. */
>> +       np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "linaro,optee-tz");
>> +       if (np && of_device_is_available(np))
>> +               tee_detected = true;
>> +       of_node_put(np);
>> +
>> +       return tee_detected;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int stm32_romem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>>          const struct stm32_romem_cfg *cfg;
>> @@ -195,10 +220,14 @@ static int stm32_romem_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>          } else {
>>                  priv->cfg.size = cfg->size;
>>                  priv->lower = cfg->lower;
>> -               if (cfg->ta) {
>> +               if (cfg->ta || optee_presence_check()) {
>>                          rc = stm32_bsec_optee_ta_open(&priv->ctx);
>>                          /* wait for OP-TEE client driver to be up and ready */
>> -                       if (rc)
>> +                       if (rc == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>> +                               /* BSEC PTA is required or SMC not ready */
>> +                               if (cfg->ta || !stm32_bsec_smc_check())
>> +                                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +                       } else if (rc)
> Could you fix the logic? The sequence here fails to fallback to BSEC
> SMC service if optee does not embed BSEC PTA service and optee driver
> is probed before stm32_romem.


Yes, I will modify it...


my patch is working only if OP-TEE is probed after BSEC NVMEM when RC = 
defered


stm32_bsec_smc_check() is  not called the OP-TEE is already porbed

(not deferred) but TA is not integrated


>
> Br,
> etienne
>
>>                                  return rc;
>>                          rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, stm32_bsec_optee_ta_close, priv->ctx);
>>                          if (rc) {
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list