[PATCH v2 01/23] clk: mediatek: mt8192: Correctly unregister and free clocks on failure
Markus Schneider-Pargmann
msp at baylibre.com
Wed Jan 4 02:55:35 PST 2023
Hi Angelo,
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 10:42:37AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> If anything fails during probe of the clock controller(s), unregister
> (and kfree!) whatever we have previously registered to leave with a
> clean state and prevent leaks.
>
> Fixes: 710573dee31b ("clk: mediatek: Add MT8192 basic clocks support")
> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno at collabora.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c
> index 0e88588b2c49..eff66ca6c6a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8192.c
> @@ -1100,27 +1100,61 @@ static int clk_mt8192_top_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(base))
> return PTR_ERR(base);
>
> - mtk_clk_register_fixed_clks(top_fixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_fixed_clks), top_clk_data);
> - mtk_clk_register_factors(top_early_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_early_divs), top_clk_data);
> - mtk_clk_register_factors(top_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_divs), top_clk_data);
> - mtk_clk_register_muxes(top_mtk_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_mtk_muxes), node, &mt8192_clk_lock,
> - top_clk_data);
> - mtk_clk_register_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), base, &mt8192_clk_lock,
> - top_clk_data);
> - mtk_clk_register_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), base, &mt8192_clk_lock,
> - top_clk_data);
> - r = mtk_clk_register_gates(node, top_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_clks), top_clk_data);
> + r = mtk_clk_register_fixed_clks(top_fixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_fixed_clks), top_clk_data);
> if (r)
> return r;
>
> + r = mtk_clk_register_factors(top_early_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_early_divs), top_clk_data);
> + if (r)
> + goto unregister_fixed_clks;
> +
> + r = mtk_clk_register_factors(top_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_divs), top_clk_data);
> + if (r)
> + goto unregister_early_factors;
> +
> + r = mtk_clk_register_muxes(top_mtk_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_mtk_muxes), node,
> + &mt8192_clk_lock, top_clk_data);
> + if (r)
> + goto unregister_factors;
> +
> + r = mtk_clk_register_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), base,
> + &mt8192_clk_lock, top_clk_data);
> + if (r)
> + goto unregister_muxes;
> +
> + r = mtk_clk_register_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), base,
> + &mt8192_clk_lock, top_clk_data);
> + if (r)
> + goto unregister_top_composites;
> +
> + r = mtk_clk_register_gates(node, top_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_clks), top_clk_data);
> + if (r)
> + goto unregister_adj_divs_composites;
> +
> r = clk_mt8192_reg_mfg_mux_notifier(&pdev->dev,
> top_clk_data->hws[CLK_TOP_MFG_PLL_SEL]->clk);
> if (r)
> - return r;
> -
> + goto unregister_gates;
>
> return of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get,
> top_clk_data);
I think you may have missed this one. If of_clk_add_hw_provider fails
you should unregister all of the above, right?
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp at baylibre.com>
> +
> +unregister_gates:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_gates(top_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_clks), top_clk_data);
> +unregister_adj_divs_composites:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_adj_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_adj_divs), top_clk_data);
> +unregister_top_composites:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_composites(top_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_muxes), top_clk_data);
> +unregister_muxes:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_muxes(top_mtk_muxes, ARRAY_SIZE(top_mtk_muxes), top_clk_data);
> +unregister_factors:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_factors(top_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_divs), top_clk_data);
> +unregister_early_factors:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_factors(top_early_divs, ARRAY_SIZE(top_early_divs), top_clk_data);
> +unregister_fixed_clks:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_fixed_clks(top_fixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(top_fixed_clks),
> + top_clk_data);
> + return r;
> }
>
> static int clk_mt8192_infra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -1139,14 +1173,16 @@ static int clk_mt8192_infra_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> r = mtk_register_reset_controller_with_dev(&pdev->dev, &clk_rst_desc);
> if (r)
> - goto free_clk_data;
> + goto unregister_gates;
>
> r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
> if (r)
> - goto free_clk_data;
> + goto unregister_gates;
>
> return r;
>
> +unregister_gates:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_gates(infra_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(infra_clks), clk_data);
> free_clk_data:
> mtk_free_clk_data(clk_data);
> return r;
> @@ -1168,10 +1204,12 @@ static int clk_mt8192_peri_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
> if (r)
> - goto free_clk_data;
> + goto unregister_gates;
>
> return r;
>
> +unregister_gates:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_gates(peri_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(peri_clks), clk_data);
> free_clk_data:
> mtk_free_clk_data(clk_data);
> return r;
> @@ -1194,10 +1232,12 @@ static int clk_mt8192_apmixed_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> r = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, clk_data);
> if (r)
> - goto free_clk_data;
> + goto unregister_gates;
>
> return r;
>
> +unregister_gates:
> + mtk_clk_unregister_gates(apmixed_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(apmixed_clks), clk_data);
> free_clk_data:
> mtk_free_clk_data(clk_data);
> return r;
> --
> 2.39.0
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list