[PATCH RFC net-next v2 11/12] net: dsa: Separate C22 and C45 MDIO bus transaction methods

[Andrew Lunn]

> Since clause 45 PHYs are identified by the "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"
> compatible string (otherwise they are C22), then a PHY which is not
> described in the device tree can only be C22. So this is why
> ds->slave_mii_bus only deals with clause 22 methods, and the true reason
> behind the comment above.
> 
> But actually this premise is no longer true since Luiz' commit
> fe7324b93222 ("net: dsa: OF-ware slave_mii_bus"), which introduced the
> strange concept of an "OF-aware helper for internal PHYs which are not
> described in the device tree". After his patch, it is possible to have
> something like this:
> 
> 	ethernet-switch {
> 		ethernet-ports {
> 			port at 1 {
> 				reg = <1>;
> 			};
> 		};
> 
> 		mdio {
> 			ethernet-phy at 1 {
> 				compatible = "ethernet-phy-ieee802.3-c45"
> 				reg = <1>;
> 			};
> 		};
> 	};
> 
> As you can see, this is a clause 45 internal PHY which lacks a
> phy-handle, so its bus must be put in ds->slave_mii_bus in order for
> dsa_slave_phy_connect() to see it without that phy-handle (based on the
> port number matching with the PHY number). After Luiz' patch, this kind
> of device tree is possible, and it invalidates the assumption about
> ds->slave_mii_bus only driving C22 PHYs.

My memory is hazy, but i think at the time i wrote these patches,
there was no DSA driver which made use of ds->slave_mii_bus with
C45. So i took the short cut of only supporting C22.

Those DSA drivers which do support C45 all register their bus directly
with the MDIO core.

So Luiz patches may allow a C45 bus, but are there any drivers today
actually using it?

	 Andrew