[RFC PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: panel: Introduce dual-link LVDS panel

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 03/01/2023 07:46, Aradhya Bhatia wrote:
> Dual-link LVDS interfaces have 2 links, with even pixels traveling on
> one link, and odd pixels on the other. These panels are also generic in
> nature, with no documented constraints, much like their single-link
> counterparts, "panel-lvds".
> 
> Add a new compatible, "panel-dual-lvds", and a dt-binding document for
> these panels.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1 at ti.com>
> ---
>  .../display/panel/panel-dual-lvds.yaml        | 157 ++++++++++++++++++
>  MAINTAINERS                                   |   1 +
>  2 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-dual-lvds.yaml
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-dual-lvds.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-dual-lvds.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..88a7aa2410be
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-dual-lvds.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/panel-dual-lvds.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Generic Dual-Link LVDS Display Panel
> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Aradhya Bhatia <a-bhatia1 at ti.com>
> +  - Thierry Reding <thierry.reding at gmail.com>
> +
> +description: |
> +  A dual-LVDS interface is a dual-link connection with the even pixels
> +  traveling on one link, and the odd pixels traveling on the other.
> +
> +allOf:
> +  - $ref: panel-common.yaml#
> +  - $ref: /schemas/display/lvds.yaml/#

Drop trailing /

> +
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    oneOf:
> +      - items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - lincolntech,lcd185-101ct
> +              - microtips,13-101hieb0hf0-s
> +          - const: panel-dual-lvds
> +      - const: panel-dual-lvds

You cannot have this compatible alone.

> +
> +  ports:
> +    $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> +
> +    properties:
> +      port at 0:
> +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> +        unevaluatedProperties: false
> +        description: The sink for first set of LVDS pixels.
> +
> +        properties:
> +          dual-lvds-odd-pixels:
> +            type: boolean
> +
> +          dual-lvds-even-pixels:
> +            type: boolean
> +
> +        oneOf:
> +          - required: [dual-lvds-odd-pixels]
> +          - required: [dual-lvds-even-pixels]
> +
> +      port at 1:
> +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> +        unevaluatedProperties: false
> +        description: The sink for second set of LVDS pixels.
> +
> +        properties:
> +          dual-lvds-even-pixels:
> +            type: boolean
> +
> +          dual-lvds-odd-pixels:
> +            type: boolean
> +
> +        oneOf:
> +          - required: [dual-lvds-even-pixels]
> +          - required: [dual-lvds-odd-pixels]
> +
> +    allOf:
> +      - if:
> +          properties:
> +            port at 0:
> +              properties:
> +                dual-lvds-odd-pixels: true

That's not correct clause. It has no effect.

> +              required:
> +                - dual-lvds-odd-pixels
> +        then:
> +          properties:
> +            port at 1:
> +              properties:
> +                dual-lvds-even-pixels: true
> +                dual-lvds-odd-pixels: false

Why do you need this? Your oneOf before already solves it.

> +
> +      - if:
> +          properties:
> +            port at 0:
> +              properties:
> +                dual-lvds-even-pixels: true
> +              required:
> +                - dual-lvds-even-pixels
> +        then:
> +          properties:
> +            port at 1:
> +              properties:
> +                dual-lvds-odd-pixels: true
> +                dual-lvds-even-pixels: false
> +
> +    required:
> +      - port at 0
> +      - port at 1
> +
> +  port: false
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - width-mm
> +  - height-mm
> +  - data-mapping
> +  - panel-timing
> +  - ports
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |+

Drop +

> +    panel-dual-lvds {

Just "panel". Node names should be generic.

> +      compatible = "microtips,13-101hieb0hf0-s", "panel-dual-lvds";
> +
> +      width-mm = <217>;
> +      height-mm = <136>;
> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof