[PATCH v2 4/7] scsi: ufs: core: Add hwq print for debug
Bao D. Nguyen
quic_nguyenb at quicinc.com
Mon Feb 27 18:57:17 PST 2023
On 2/26/2023 7:14 PM, Ziqi Chen wrote:
> Hi Powen,
>
> The Bao. D . Nguyen (quic_nguyenb at quicinc.com) from QCOM already made
> patch to support MCQ abort.
>
> ++ Bao here to be aware of it in case your error handing patch
> conflict with his abort handling patch.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Ziqi
>
>
> On 2/23/2023 10:13 PM, Powen Kao (高伯文) wrote:
>> Hi Ziqi,
>>
>> Thanks for ur comments.
>>
>> This piece of code successfully dump relevent registers on our
>> platform. As you know, mcq error handling flow is not ready yet so the
>> insertion point might not seems to be reasonable.
>>
>> Maybe drop this patch for now, I will send it later with error handling
>> patches.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 18:14 +0800, Ziqi Chen wrote:
>>> Hi Po-Wen,
>>>
>>> On 2/22/2023 11:04 AM, Po-Wen Kao wrote:
>>>> +void ufshcd_mcq_print_hwqs(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned long
>>>> bitmap)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int id, i;
>>>> + char prefix[15];
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!is_mcq_enabled(hba))
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + for_each_set_bit(id, &bitmap, hba->nr_hw_queues) {
>>>> + snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "q%d SQCFG: ", id);
>>>> + ufshcd_hex_dump(prefix,
>>>> + hba->mcq_base + MCQ_QCFG_SIZE * id,
>>>> MCQ_QCFG_SQ_SIZE);
>>> Is your purpose dump per hardware queue registers here? If yes, why
>>> don't use ufsmcq_readl() to save to a buffer and then use
>>> ufshcd_hex_dump()
>>>
>>> to dump ? Are you sure ufshcd_hex_dump() can dump register directly?
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> + snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "q%d CQCFG: ", id);
>>>> + ufshcd_hex_dump(prefix,
>>>> + hba->mcq_base + MCQ_QCFG_SIZE * id +
>>>> MCQ_QCFG_SQ_SIZE, MCQ_QCFG_CQ_SIZE);
>>> Same to above comment.
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < OPR_MAX ; i++) {
>>>> + snprintf(prefix, sizeof(prefix), "q%d OPR%d: ",
>>>> id, i);
>>>> + ufshcd_hex_dump(prefix, mcq_opr_base(hba, i,
>>>> id), mcq_opr_size[i]);
>>> Same.
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> @@ -574,7 +569,16 @@ void ufshcd_print_trs(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>>>> unsigned long bitmap, bool pr_prdt)
>>>> if (pr_prdt)
>>>> ufshcd_hex_dump("UPIU PRDT: ", lrbp-
>>>>> ucd_prdt_ptr,
>>>> ufshcd_sg_entry_size(hba) *
>>>> prdt_length);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (is_mcq_enabled(hba)) {
>>>> + cmd = lrbp->cmd;
>>>> + if (!cmd)
>>>> + return;
>>>> + hwq = ufshcd_mcq_req_to_hwq(hba,
>>>> scsi_cmd_to_rq(cmd));
>>>> + ufshcd_mcq_print_hwqs(hba, 1 << hwq->id);
>>> Calling registers dump function in ufshcd_print_trs() is not
>>> reasonable,
>>> eg.. for each aborted request, it would print out all hwq registers,
>>> it's not make sense.
>>>
>>> I think we should move it out of ufshcd_print_trs().
>>>
>>>> + }
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Ziqi
>>>
Hi Powen,
I am going to push the mcq abort handling and mcq error handling code
upstream for review in a couple days. Would that work for you?
Regards,
Bao
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list