[PATCH v1 3/3] arch/arm: dts: introduce meson-a1 device tree

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Mon Feb 27 06:41:23 PST 2023


On 27/02/2023 15:39, Dmitry Rokosov wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof!
> 
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:09:25AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
>>>> describes following compontents: CPU, GIC, IRQ, Timer, UART,
>>>> PIN controller. It's capable of booting up into
>>>> the serial console.
>>>>
>>>> This is based on arm64 version of meson-a1.dtsi.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Romanov <avromanov at sberdevices.ru>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/meson-a1.dtsi | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>
>>> There is such file and there is such DTS/hardware support. I don't see
>>> any reason why entire DTSI should be duplicated. What's more, your
>>> commit does not explain it - does not justify duplication.
>>
>> One more comment - I think you just added dead code. It's
>> uncompilable/untestable. Otherwise, please share how to build this DTSI
>> without DTS.
> 
> You are right, Alexey doesn't provide any exact *.dts file for any
> board, and *.dtsi file should be included somewhere, otherwise this is
> dead code.
> Unfortunately, our internal board *.dts file is useless for kernel
> community, cause there is not any chance to burn locally compiled kernel
> to our product due to secureboot protection.
> But I think there is one possible option. We have reference Amlogic
> boards somewhere in the office. So we can test 32-bit configuration on
> it and prepare proper *.dts file for that. What do you think, it
> reasanoble?

You just need to provide valid board which works in 32-bit mode. Anyway
duplicating DTSI is a no-go and we do not do it in other platforms.


Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list