[PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: omap: add phytec pcm-049 som and pcm-959 dev board

[Tony Lindgren]

* Rob Herring <robh at kernel.org> [230226 17:22]:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 08:25:08AM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:00:50AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> > > On 2/22/23 2:38 PM, Colin Foster wrote:
> > > > Add yaml documentation for TI OMAP devices for the Phytec PCM-049 SoM and
> > > > the Phytec PCM-959 development kit.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster at in-advantage.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > 
> > > > v4
> > > >      * New patch, based on a WIP from Andrew Davis <afd at ti.com>
> > > > 
> > > > ---
> > > >   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml      | 29 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> > > >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti,omap.yaml
> > > 
> > > How will this work if I add the same file? Why not take my WIP patch, make
> > > the suggested changes from Rob, then have it as your first patch in this
> > > series?
> > 
> > Is your WIP intended to convert all omap.txt to ti,omap.yaml? Or chunk
> > off devices one at a time?
> > 
> > If the former, when your patch is done it should be a pretty simple
> > rebase conflict resolution. If the latter (which feels more digestable)
> > this offers that template. This was Rob's / Tony's suggestion, albeit
> > before you sent your patch set.
> > 
> > 
> > Anyway, I'm happy to do any of the following:
> > 
> > 1. Take Andrew's patches, add these references and re-submit.
> > 2. Keep this set as-is (with the typo fix) and when Andrew's WIP is done
> >    it should be an easy rebase before submission.
> > 3. Wait for Andrew's WIP to be done, then submit with this update.
> > 
> > 
> > I'd like to avoid #3 because I don't know where this might fall on your
> > priorities list.
> 
> If you are willing to do #1, that's certainly my preference.

That would be great!

Tony