[PATCH v3 3/3] ARM: dts: imx7d-remarkable2: Enable the rohm,bd71815

[Matti Vaittinen]

Hi Alistair,

On 2/25/23 13:37, Alistair Francis wrote:
> Add support for the rohm,bd71815 power controller controller for the
> reMarkable 2.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair at alistair23.me>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-remarkable2.dts | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 158 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-remarkable2.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-remarkable2.dts
> index 288fc8611117..9ecb733545cc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-remarkable2.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7d-remarkable2.dts
> @@ -91,6 +91,10 @@ wifi_pwrseq: wifi_pwrseq {
>   	};
>   };
>   
> +&cpu0 {
> +	cpu-supply = <&buck1_reg>;
> +};
> +
>   &clks {
>   	assigned-clocks = <&clks IMX7D_CLKO2_ROOT_SRC>,
>   			  <&clks IMX7D_CLKO2_ROOT_DIV>;
> @@ -118,6 +122,147 @@ wacom_digitizer: digitizer at 9 {
>   	};
>   };
>   
> +&i2c2 {
> +	clock-frequency = <100000>;
> +	pinctrl-names = "default";
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_i2c2>;
> +	status = "okay";
> +
> +	bd71815: pmic at 4b {
> +		compatible = "rohm,bd71815";
> +		reg = <0x4b>;
> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
> +		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_bd71815>;
> +		interrupt-parent = <&gpio6>; /* PMIC_INT_B GPIO6_IO16 */
> +		interrupts = <16 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +		clocks = <&clks IMX7D_CLKO2_ROOT_SRC>;
> +		clock-output-names = "bd71815-32k-out";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +		#gpio-cells = <1>;
> +
> +		regulators {
> +			#address-cells = <1>;
> +			#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +			buck1_reg: regulator at 0 {
> +				reg = <0>;
> +				regulator-compatible = "buck1";

I'm sure you have learned to regard my comments with certain care ;) (I 
think it was you for whom I gave an advice - which resulted a board to 
be bricked :| So, please treat my comment as if I did not know what I am 
talking about).

Anyways, I believe the "regulator-compatible" is deprecated and should 
no longer be used to match the node with the regulator? Instead, the 
regulator node name itself should be used for the matching.

ref. 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c#L380

I don't think the regulator-compatible can even be found from the 
regulator.yaml binding list...

With this remark - (and what ever it is worth):
Reviewed-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount at gmail.com>

-- 
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~