[PATCH v2 5/6] KVM: arm64: Introduce ID register specific descriptor
Reiji Watanabe
reijiw at google.com
Fri Feb 24 20:00:23 PST 2023
Hi Jing,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 1:58 PM Jing Zhang <jingzhangos at google.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce an ID feature register specific descriptor to include ID
> register specific fields and callbacks besides its corresponding
> general system register descriptor.
> New fields for ID register descriptor would be added later when it
> is necessary to support a writable ID register.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Co-developed-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw at google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jing Zhang <jingzhangos at google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c | 187 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c
> index 14ae03a1d8d0..15d0338742b6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/id_regs.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@
>
> #include "sys_regs.h"
>
> +struct id_reg_desc {
> + const struct sys_reg_desc reg_desc;
> +};
> +
> static u8 vcpu_pmuver(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> if (kvm_vcpu_has_pmu(vcpu))
> @@ -329,21 +333,25 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
>
> /* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */
> -#define ID_SANITISED(name) { \
> - SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
> - .access = access_id_reg, \
> - .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> - .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> - .visibility = id_visibility, \
> +#define ID_SANITISED(name) { \
> + .reg_desc = { \
> + SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
> + .access = access_id_reg, \
> + .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> + .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> + .visibility = id_visibility, \
> + }, \
> }
>
> /* sys_reg_desc initialiser for known cpufeature ID registers */
> -#define AA32_ID_SANITISED(name) { \
> - SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
> - .access = access_id_reg, \
> - .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> - .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> - .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, \
> +#define AA32_ID_SANITISED(name) { \
> + .reg_desc = { \
> + SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
> + .access = access_id_reg, \
> + .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> + .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> + .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, \
> + }, \
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -351,12 +359,14 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * register with encoding Op0=3, Op1=0, CRn=0, CRm=crm, Op2=op2
> * (1 <= crm < 8, 0 <= Op2 < 8).
> */
> -#define ID_UNALLOCATED(crm, op2) { \
> - Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(0), CRm(crm), Op2(op2), \
> - .access = access_id_reg, \
> - .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> - .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> - .visibility = raz_visibility \
> +#define ID_UNALLOCATED(crm, op2) { \
> + .reg_desc = { \
> + Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(0), CRm(crm), Op2(op2), \
> + .access = access_id_reg, \
> + .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> + .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> + .visibility = raz_visibility \
> + }, \
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -364,15 +374,17 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * For now, these are exposed just like unallocated ID regs: they appear
> * RAZ for the guest.
> */
> -#define ID_HIDDEN(name) { \
> - SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
> - .access = access_id_reg, \
> - .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> - .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> - .visibility = raz_visibility, \
> +#define ID_HIDDEN(name) { \
> + .reg_desc = { \
> + SYS_DESC(SYS_##name), \
> + .access = access_id_reg, \
> + .get_user = get_id_reg, \
> + .set_user = set_id_reg, \
> + .visibility = raz_visibility, \
> + }, \
> }
>
> -static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = {
> +static const struct id_reg_desc id_reg_descs[KVM_ARM_ID_REG_NUM] = {
> /*
> * ID regs: all ID_SANITISED() entries here must have corresponding
> * entries in arm64_ftr_regs[].
> @@ -382,9 +394,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = {
> /* CRm=1 */
> AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR0_EL1),
> AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_PFR1_EL1),
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
> - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_dfr0_el1,
> - .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, },
> + { .reg_desc = {
> + SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1),
> + .access = access_id_reg,
> + .get_user = get_id_reg,
> + .set_user = set_id_dfr0_el1,
> + .visibility = aa32_id_visibility, },
> + },
> ID_HIDDEN(ID_AFR0_EL1),
> AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR0_EL1),
> AA32_ID_SANITISED(ID_MMFR1_EL1),
> @@ -413,8 +429,12 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = {
>
> /* AArch64 ID registers */
> /* CRm=4 */
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
> - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1, },
> + { .reg_desc = {
> + SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1),
> + .access = access_id_reg,
> + .get_user = get_id_reg,
> + .set_user = set_id_aa64pfr0_el1, },
> + },
> ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64PFR1_EL1),
> ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 2),
> ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 3),
> @@ -424,8 +444,12 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = {
> ID_UNALLOCATED(4, 7),
>
> /* CRm=5 */
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1), .access = access_id_reg,
> - .get_user = get_id_reg, .set_user = set_id_aa64dfr0_el1, },
> + { .reg_desc = {
> + SYS_DESC(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1),
> + .access = access_id_reg,
> + .get_user = get_id_reg,
> + .set_user = set_id_aa64dfr0_el1, },
> + },
> ID_SANITISED(ID_AA64DFR1_EL1),
> ID_UNALLOCATED(5, 2),
> ID_UNALLOCATED(5, 3),
> @@ -457,7 +481,13 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc id_reg_descs[] = {
>
> const struct sys_reg_desc *kvm_arm_find_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_params *params)
> {
> - return find_reg(params, id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs));
> + u32 id;
> +
> + id = reg_to_encoding(params);
> + if (!is_id_reg(id))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return &id_reg_descs[IDREG_IDX(id)].reg_desc;
> }
>
> void kvm_arm_reset_id_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -465,39 +495,106 @@ void kvm_arm_reset_id_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> unsigned long i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs); i++)
> - if (id_reg_descs[i].reset)
> - id_reg_descs[i].reset(vcpu, &id_reg_descs[i]);
> + if (id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc.reset)
> + id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc.reset(vcpu, &id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc);
> }
>
> int kvm_arm_get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> {
> - return kvm_sys_reg_get_user(vcpu, reg,
> - id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs));
> + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr;
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r;
> + struct sys_reg_params params;
> + u64 val;
> + int ret;
> + u32 id;
> +
> + if (!index_to_params(reg->id, ¶ms))
> + return -ENOENT;
> + id = reg_to_encoding(¶ms);
> +
> + if (!is_id_reg(id))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + r = &id_reg_descs[IDREG_IDX(id)].reg_desc;
> + if (r->get_user) {
> + ret = (r->get_user)(vcpu, r, &val);
> + } else {
> + ret = 0;
> + val = 0;
When get_user is NULL, I wonder why you want to treat them RAZ.
It can be achieved by using visibility(), which I think might be
better to use before calling get_user.
Another option would be simply reading from IDREG(), which I would
guess might be useful(?) when no special handling is necessary.
> + }
> +
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = put_user(val, uaddr);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> int kvm_arm_set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> {
> - return kvm_sys_reg_set_user(vcpu, reg,
> - id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs));
> + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(unsigned long)reg->addr;
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r;
> + struct sys_reg_params params;
> + u64 val;
> + int ret;
> + u32 id;
> +
> + if (!index_to_params(reg->id, ¶ms))
> + return -ENOENT;
> + id = reg_to_encoding(¶ms);
> +
> + if (!is_id_reg(id))
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + if (get_user(val, uaddr))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + r = &id_reg_descs[IDREG_IDX(id)].reg_desc;
> +
> + if (sysreg_user_write_ignore(vcpu, r))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (r->set_user)
> + ret = (r->set_user)(vcpu, r, val);
> + else
> + ret = 0;
This appears to be the same handling as WI.
How do you plan to use this set_user == NULL case ?
I don't think this shouldn't happen with the current code.
You might want to use WARN_ONCE here ?
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> bool kvm_arm_check_idreg_table(void)
> {
> - return check_sysreg_table(id_reg_descs, ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs), false);
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs); i++) {
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r = &id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc;
> +
> + if (r->reg && !r->reset) {
I don't think we need to check "!r->reset".
If r->reg is not NULL, I believe the entry must be incorrect.
> + kvm_err("sys_reg table %pS entry %d lacks reset\n", r, i);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (i && cmp_sys_reg(&id_reg_descs[i-1].reg_desc, r) >= 0) {
In this table, each ID register needs to be in the proper place.
So, I would think what should be checked would be if each entry
in the table includes the right ID register.
(e.g. id_reg_descs[0] must be for ID_PFR0_EL1, etc)
Thank you,
Reiji
> + kvm_err("sys_reg table %pS entry %d out of order\n",
> + &id_reg_descs[i - 1].reg_desc, i - 1);
> + return false;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> }
>
> /* Assumed ordered tables, see kvm_sys_reg_table_init. */
> int kvm_arm_walk_id_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uind)
> {
> - const struct sys_reg_desc *i2, *end2;
> + const struct id_reg_desc *i2, *end2;
> unsigned int total = 0;
> int err;
>
> i2 = id_reg_descs;
> end2 = id_reg_descs + ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs);
>
> - while (i2 != end2) {
> - err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, i2++, &uind, &total);
> + for (; i2 != end2; i2++) {
> + err = walk_one_sys_reg(vcpu, &(i2->reg_desc), &uind, &total);
> if (err)
> return err;
> }
> @@ -515,12 +612,12 @@ void kvm_arm_set_default_id_regs(struct kvm *kvm)
> u64 val;
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(id_reg_descs); i++) {
> - id = reg_to_encoding(&id_reg_descs[i]);
> + id = reg_to_encoding(&id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_id_reg(id)))
> /* Shouldn't happen */
> continue;
>
> - if (id_reg_descs[i].visibility == raz_visibility)
> + if (id_reg_descs[i].reg_desc.visibility == raz_visibility)
> /* Hidden or reserved ID register */
> continue;
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index a4350f0737c3..cdcd61ac9868 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -2518,7 +2518,7 @@ int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> * Userspace API
> *****************************************************************************/
>
> -static bool index_to_params(u64 id, struct sys_reg_params *params)
> +bool index_to_params(u64 id, struct sys_reg_params *params)
> {
> switch (id & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) {
> case KVM_REG_SIZE_U64:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
> index 5cfab83ce8b8..3797d1b494a2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.h
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static inline bool write_to_read_only(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> return false;
> }
>
> +bool index_to_params(u64 id, struct sys_reg_params *params);
> const struct sys_reg_desc *get_reg_by_id(u64 id,
> const struct sys_reg_desc table[],
> unsigned int num);
> --
> 2.39.1.581.gbfd45094c4-goog
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list