[PATCH v2 3/4] soc: imx: imx8m-blk-ctrl: Scan subnodes and bind drivers to them

[Liu Ying]

Hi Marek,

On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 04:50 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
> This particular block can have DT subnodes describing the LVDS LDB
> bridge. Instead of misusing simple-bus to scan for those nodes, do
> the scan within the driver.
> 
> Fixes: 94e6197dadc9 ("arm64: dts: imx8mp: Add LCDIF2 & LDB nodes")
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
> ---
> Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at ew.tq-group.com>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam at gmail.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt at linaro.org>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx at nxp.com>
> Cc: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan at nxp.com>
> Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran at gmail.com>
> Cc: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu at nxp.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt at kernel.org>
> Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo at kernel.org>
> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> ---
> V2: - Turn this into 3/4
>     - Warn and continue in case of error
> ---
>  drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c b/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c
> index 399cb85105a18..4f5736e612fb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/imx8m-blk-ctrl.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,9 @@ static int imx8m_blk_ctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	const struct imx8m_blk_ctrl_data *bc_data;
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct platform_device *child;
>  	struct imx8m_blk_ctrl *bc;
> +	struct device_node *np;
>  	void __iomem *base;
>  	int i, ret;
>  
> @@ -310,6 +312,13 @@ static int imx8m_blk_ctrl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	dev_set_drvdata(dev, bc);
>  
> +	for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) {
> +		child = of_platform_device_create(np, NULL, dev);
> +		if (child)
> +			continue;

We usually check and handle abnormal cases. So, better to check
'!child" and warn in the 'if' clause. Anyway, the logic looks ok. So,
kinda

Reviewed-by: Liu Ying <victor.liu at nxp.com>

Regards,
Liu Ying

> +		dev_warn(dev, "failed to create device for %pOF\n", np);
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  cleanup_provider: