[PATCH v4 2/2] optee: add per cpu asynchronous notification
Etienne Carriere
etienne.carriere at linaro.org
Wed Feb 15 04:41:43 PST 2023
Hello Sumit,
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 12:11, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 at 15:28, Etienne Carriere
> <etienne.carriere at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Implements use of per-cpu irq for optee asynchronous notification.
> >
> > Existing optee async notif implementation allows OP-TEE world to
> > raise an interrupt for which Linux optee driver will query pending
> > events bound to waiting tasks in Linux world or threaded bottom half
> > tasks to be invoked in TEE world. This change allows the signaling
> > interrupt to be a per-cpu interrupt as with Arm GIC PPIs.
> >
> > Using a PPI instead of an SPI is useful when no GIC lines are provisioned
> > in the chip design for OP-TEE async notifications. Instead of using an
> > unused GIC SPI for a specific platform, optee can use a common GIC PPI
> > across platforms.
> >
> > Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg at linaro.org>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue at foss.st.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Fixed typo in commit message.
> > - Added few words in commit message about why we do this change.
> > - Appended a 2nd commit to the series for request DT bindings update.
> >
> > Changes since v2:
> > - Irq and per-cpu irq no more share the primary same handler function
> > but have a common irq_handler() helper function.
> > - Removed useless spinlocks.
> > - Wrapped lines > 80 char.
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Fixed missing __percpu attribute reported by kernel test robot.
> > - Rephrased commit message and added Cc tags.
> > ---
> > drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h | 22 +++++++
> > drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > index 04ae58892608..e5bd3548691f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/optee_private.h
> > @@ -94,11 +94,33 @@ struct optee_supp {
> > struct completion reqs_c;
> > };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * struct optee_pcpu - per cpu notif private struct passed to work functions
> > + * @optee optee device reference
> > + */
> > +struct optee_pcpu {
> > + struct optee *optee;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * struct optee_smc - optee smc communication struct
> > + * @invoke_fn handler function to invoke secure monitor
> > + * @memremaped_shm virtual address of memory in shared memory pool
> > + * @sec_caps: secure world capabilities defined by
> > + * OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_* in optee_smc.h
> > + * @notif_irq interrupt used as async notification by OP-TEE or 0
> > + * @optee_pcpu per_cpu optee instance for per cpu work or NULL
> > + * @notif_pcpu_wq workqueue for per cpu aynchronous notification or NULL
> > + * @notif_pcpu_work work for per cpu asynchronous notification
> > + */
> > struct optee_smc {
> > optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn;
> > void *memremaped_shm;
> > u32 sec_caps;
> > unsigned int notif_irq;
> > + struct optee_pcpu __percpu *optee_pcpu;
> > + struct workqueue_struct *notif_pcpu_wq;
> > + struct work_struct notif_pcpu_work;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > index a1c1fa1a9c28..eff35f66399e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/smc_abi.c
> > @@ -991,9 +991,8 @@ static u32 get_async_notif_value(optee_invoke_fn *invoke_fn, bool *value_valid,
> > return res.a1;
> > }
> >
> > -static irqreturn_t notif_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +static irqreturn_t irq_handler(struct optee *optee)
> > {
> > - struct optee *optee = dev_id;
> > bool do_bottom_half = false;
> > bool value_valid;
> > bool value_pending;
> > @@ -1016,6 +1015,11 @@ static irqreturn_t notif_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > +static irqreturn_t notif_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + return irq_handler((struct optee *)dev_id);
> > +}
> > +
> > static irqreturn_t notif_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > {
> > struct optee *optee = dev_id;
> > @@ -1025,7 +1029,7 @@ static irqreturn_t notif_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > -static int optee_smc_notif_init_irq(struct optee *optee, u_int irq)
> > +static int init_irq(struct optee *optee, u_int irq)
> > {
> > int rc;
> >
> > @@ -1040,12 +1044,97 @@ static int optee_smc_notif_init_irq(struct optee *optee, u_int irq)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static irqreturn_t notif_pcpu_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> > +{
> > + struct optee_pcpu __percpu *pcpu = (struct optee_pcpu *)dev_id;
> > + struct optee *optee = pcpu->optee;
> > +
> > + if (irq_handler(optee) == IRQ_WAKE_THREAD)
> > + queue_work(optee->smc.notif_pcpu_wq,
> > + &optee->smc.notif_pcpu_work);
> > +
> > + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > +{
> > + struct optee_smc *optee_smc = container_of(work, struct optee_smc,
> > + notif_pcpu_work);
> > + struct optee *optee = container_of(optee_smc, struct optee, smc);
> > +
> > + optee_smc_do_bottom_half(optee->ctx);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int init_pcpu_irq(struct optee *optee, u_int irq)
> > +{
> > + struct optee_pcpu __percpu *optee_pcpu;
> > + int cpu;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + optee_pcpu = alloc_percpu(struct optee_pcpu);
> > + if (!optee_pcpu)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> > + struct optee_pcpu __percpu *p = per_cpu_ptr(optee_pcpu, cpu);
> > +
> > + p->optee = optee;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rc = request_percpu_irq(irq, notif_pcpu_irq_handler,
> > + "optee_pcpu_notification", optee_pcpu);
> > + if (rc)
> > + goto err_free_pcpu;
> > +
> > + enable_percpu_irq(irq, 0);
>
> AFAICS, this percpu irq is only enabled for CPU which is doing OP-TEE
> driver probe. How would it be enabled for other CPUs? Hot plugged
> CPUs?
>
> > +
> > + INIT_WORK(&optee->smc.notif_pcpu_work, notif_pcpu_irq_work_fn);
> > + optee->smc.notif_pcpu_wq = create_workqueue("optee_pcpu_notification");
> > + if (!optee->smc.notif_pcpu_wq) {
> > + rc = -EINVAL;
> > + goto err_free_pcpu_irq;
> > + }
> > +
> > + optee->smc.optee_pcpu = optee_pcpu;
> > + optee->smc.notif_irq = irq;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +err_free_pcpu_irq:
> > + disable_percpu_irq(irq);
> > + free_percpu_irq(irq, optee_pcpu);
> > +err_free_pcpu:
> > + free_percpu(optee_pcpu);
> > +
> > + return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int optee_smc_notif_init_irq(struct optee *optee, u_int irq)
> > +{
> > + if (irq_is_percpu_devid(irq))
> > + return init_pcpu_irq(optee, irq);
> > + else
> > + return init_irq(optee, irq);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void uninit_pcpu_irq(struct optee *optee)
> > +{
> > + disable_percpu_irq(optee->smc.notif_irq);
>
> OP-TEE remove may be called on a different CPU than the one which did
> the OP-TEE probe. So we need to disable percpu irq for every CPU which
> I am not sure can be done in a clean manner here. AFAICS,
> cpuhp_setup_state() and friends are the commonly used APIs to
> enable/disable percpu irq.
I see your point, thanks.
Using cpuhp_setup_state() will mandate the optee driver to be
built-in, not loadable, as there is no way to unregister hpcpu
callbacks. A config switch could ensure this.
BR,
Etienne
>
> -Sumit
>
> > +
> > + free_percpu_irq(optee->smc.notif_irq, optee->smc.optee_pcpu);
> > + free_percpu(optee->smc.optee_pcpu);
> > +}
> > +
> > static void optee_smc_notif_uninit_irq(struct optee *optee)
> > {
> > if (optee->smc.sec_caps & OPTEE_SMC_SEC_CAP_ASYNC_NOTIF) {
> > optee_smc_stop_async_notif(optee->ctx);
> > if (optee->smc.notif_irq) {
> > - free_irq(optee->smc.notif_irq, optee);
> > + if (irq_is_percpu_devid(optee->smc.notif_irq))
> > + uninit_pcpu_irq(optee);
> > + else
> > + free_irq(optee->smc.notif_irq, optee);
> > +
> > irq_dispose_mapping(optee->smc.notif_irq);
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list