[PATCH] arm64: atomics: lse: improve cmpxchg implementation

Mark Rutland mark.rutland at arm.com
Mon Feb 6 03:58:52 PST 2023


For historical reasons, the LSE implementation of cmpxchg*() hard-codes
the GPRs to use, and shuffles registers around with MOVs. This is no
longer necessary, and can be simplified.

When the LSE cmpxchg implementation was added in commit:

  c342f78217e822d2 ("arm64: cmpxchg: patch in lse instructions when supported by the CPU")

... the LL/SC implementation of cmpxchg() would be placed out-of-line,
and the in-line assembly for cmpxchg would default to:

	NOP
	BL	<ll_sc_cmpxchg*_implementation>
	NOP

The LL/SC implementation of each cmpxchg() function accepted arguments
as per AAPCS64 rules, to it was necessary to place the pointer in x0,
the older value in X1, and the new value in x2, and acquire the return
value from x0. The LL/SC implementation required a temporary register
(e.g. for the STXR status value). As the LL/SC implementation preserved
the old value, the LSE implementation does likewise.

Since commit:

  addfc38672c73efd ("arm64: atomics: avoid out-of-line ll/sc atomics")

... the LSE and LL/SC implementations of cmpxchg are inlined as separate
asm blocks, with another branch choosing between thw two. Due to this,
it is no longer necessary for the LSE implementation to match the
register constraints of the LL/SC implementation. This was partially
dealt with by removing the hard-coded use of x30 in commit:

  3337cb5aea594e40 ("arm64: avoid using hard-coded registers for LSE atomics")

... but we didn't clean up the hard-coding of x0, x1, and x2.

This patch simplifies the LSE implementation of cmpxchg, removing the
register shuffling and directly clobbering the 'old' argument. This
gives the compiler greater freedom for register allocation, and avoids
redundant work.

The new constraints permit 'old' (Rs) and 'new' (Rt) to be allocated to
the same register when the initial values of the two are the same, e.g.
resulting in:

	CAS	X0, X0, [X1]

This is safe as Rs is only written back after the initial values of Rs
and Rt are consumed, and there are no UNPREDICTABLE behaviours to avoid
when Rs == Rt.

Compared to v6.2-rc4, a defconfig vmlinux is ~116KiB smaller, though the
resulting Image is the same size due to internal alignment and padding:

  [mark at lakrids:~/src/linux]% ls -al vmlinux-*
  -rwxr-xr-x 1 mark mark 137269304 Jan 16 11:59 vmlinux-after
  -rwxr-xr-x 1 mark mark 137387936 Jan 16 10:54 vmlinux-before
  [mark at lakrids:~/src/linux]% ls -al Image-*
  -rw-r--r-- 1 mark mark 38711808 Jan 16 11:59 Image-after
  -rw-r--r-- 1 mark mark 38711808 Jan 16 10:54 Image-before

This patch does not touch cmpxchg_double*() as that requires contiguous
register pairs, and separate patches will replace it with cmpxchg128*().

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland at arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will at kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h | 17 +++++------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

I spotted this when looking at Peter's cmpxchg128() series; this
should be independent and I beleive it shouldn't conflict.

Mark.

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
index a94d6dacc029..5c964259db1f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h
@@ -251,22 +251,15 @@ __lse__cmpxchg_case_##name##sz(volatile void *ptr,			\
 					      u##sz old,		\
 					      u##sz new)		\
 {									\
-	register unsigned long x0 asm ("x0") = (unsigned long)ptr;	\
-	register u##sz x1 asm ("x1") = old;				\
-	register u##sz x2 asm ("x2") = new;				\
-	unsigned long tmp;						\
-									\
 	asm volatile(							\
 	__LSE_PREAMBLE							\
-	"	mov	%" #w "[tmp], %" #w "[old]\n"			\
-	"	cas" #mb #sfx "\t%" #w "[tmp], %" #w "[new], %[v]\n"	\
-	"	mov	%" #w "[ret], %" #w "[tmp]"			\
-	: [ret] "+r" (x0), [v] "+Q" (*(u##sz *)ptr),			\
-	  [tmp] "=&r" (tmp)						\
-	: [old] "r" (x1), [new] "r" (x2)				\
+	"	cas" #mb #sfx "	%" #w "[old], %" #w "[new], %[v]\n"	\
+	: [v] "+Q" (*(u##sz *)ptr),					\
+	  [old] "+r" (old)						\
+	: [new] "r" (new)						\
 	: cl);								\
 									\
-	return x0;							\
+	return old;							\
 }
 
 __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, b,     ,  8,   )
-- 
2.30.2




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list